IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p7932-d436619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Medial Branch Blocks for Diagnosis of Facet Joint Pain Etiology and Use in Chronic Pain Litigation

Author

Listed:
  • Gordon E. Lawson

    (Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1, Canada)

  • Paul S. Nolet

    (Department of Graduate Education and Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Adam R. Little

    (Oatley Vigmond LLP, Barrie, ON L4M 6C1, Canada)

  • Anit Bhattacharyya

    (Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2 W1, Canada)

  • Vivian Wang

    (Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON M2H 3J1, Canada)

  • C. Adam Lawson

    (Shibley Righton LLP, Toronto, ON M5H 3E5, Canada)

  • Gordon D. Ko

    (Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada)

Abstract

A commonly disputed medicolegal issue is the documentation of the location, degree, and anatomical source of an injured plaintiff’s ongoing pain, particularly when the painful region is in or near the spine, and when the symptoms have arisen as result of a relatively low speed traffic crash. The purpose of our paper is to provide health and legal practitioners with strategies to identify the source of cervical pain and to aid triers of fact (decision makers) in reaching better informed conclusions. We review the medical evidence for the applications and reliability of cervical medial branch nerve blocks as an indication of painful spinal facets. We also present legal precedents for the legal admissibility of the results of such diagnostic testing as evidence of chronic spine pain after a traffic crash. Part of the reason for the dispute is the subjective nature of pain, and the fact that medical documentation of pain complaints relies primarily on the history given by the patient. A condition that can be documented objectively is chronic cervical spine facet joint pain, as demonstrated by medial branch block (injection). The diagnostic accuracy of medial branch blocks has been extensively described in the scientific medical literature, and evidence of facet blocks to objectively document chronic post-traumatic neck pain has been accepted as scientifically reliable in courts and tribunals in the USA, Canada and the United Kingdom. We conclude that there is convincing scientific medical evidence that the results of cervical facet blocks provide reliable objective evidence of chronic post-traumatic spine pain, suitable for presentation to an adjudicative decision maker.

Suggested Citation

  • Gordon E. Lawson & Paul S. Nolet & Adam R. Little & Anit Bhattacharyya & Vivian Wang & C. Adam Lawson & Gordon D. Ko, 2020. "Medial Branch Blocks for Diagnosis of Facet Joint Pain Etiology and Use in Chronic Pain Litigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7932-:d:436619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7932/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/7932/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:7932-:d:436619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.