IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7644-d431705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Term Weight Loss Results, Remission of Comorbidities and Nutritional Deficiencies of Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on Type 2 Diabetic (T2D) Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Maria-Jose Castro

    (Nursing Faculty, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain
    Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, 47004 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Jose-Maria Jimenez

    (Nursing Faculty, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain
    Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, 47004 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Miguel-Angel Carbajo

    (Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, 47004 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Maria Lopez

    (Nursing Faculty, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Maria-Jose Cao

    (Nursing Faculty, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Sara Garcia

    (Nursing Faculty, University of Valladolid, 47002 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Jaime Ruiz-Tovar

    (Centre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, 47004 Valladolid, Spain
    Department of Surgery, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28933 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the long-term weight loss results, remission of comorbidities and nutritional deficiencies of sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) on type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of all the morbidly obese and diabetic patients undergoing SG, RYGB, and OAGB as primary bariatric procedures between February 2010 and June 2015 was performed. Anthropometric parameters, remission of comorbidities, nutritional deficiencies and supplementation requirements at 1, 2 and 5 years’ follow-up were monitored. Patients lost to follow-up 5 years after surgery were excluded from the analysis. Results: 358 patients were included. The follow-up rate was 84.8%. Finally, 83 SG, 152 RYGB, and 123 OAGB patients were included in the analysis. OAGB obtained significantly greater weight loss and remission of dyslipidemia than the other techniques. There was a trend towards greater T2D and hypertension remission rate after OAGB, while fasting glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels were significantly lower after OAGB. There were no significant differences in hemoglobin or protein levels between groups. SG obtained lower iron deficiencies than the other techniques, while there were no significant differences in other nutritional deficiencies between groups. Conclusion: OAGB obtained greater weight loss and remission of dyslipidemia than RYGB or SG. Excluding lower iron deficiency rates after SG, there were no significant differences in the development of nutritional deficiencies between groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria-Jose Castro & Jose-Maria Jimenez & Miguel-Angel Carbajo & Maria Lopez & Maria-Jose Cao & Sara Garcia & Jaime Ruiz-Tovar, 2020. "Long-Term Weight Loss Results, Remission of Comorbidities and Nutritional Deficiencies of Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG), Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) on Type 2 D," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7644-:d:431705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7644/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7644/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7644-:d:431705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.