IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7587-d430940.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational, Open-Label Study of the Safety and Comfort of Gensulin ® Delivery Device Use in a Large Cohort of Adult and Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Masierek

    (Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology in Zabrze, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Katowice, Poland
    BIOTON S.A., 02-516 Warszawa, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Nabrdalik

    (Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology in Zabrze, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Katowice, Poland)

  • Hanna Kwiendacz

    (Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology in Zabrze, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Katowice, Poland)

  • Tomasz Sawczyn

    (Department of Physiology in Zabrze, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Katowice, Poland)

  • Janusz Gumprecht

    (Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology in Zabrze, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Katowice, Poland)

Abstract

Insulin treatment is necessary for many patients with type 2 diabetes, and its delivery must be safe and comfortable. This study evaluated patients’ safety and comfort when using a Gensulin ® delivery device, GensuPen (Bioton), a reusable insulin pen device for injecting Gensulin ® insulin among adult and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. This was a 4-week multicenter, prospective, observational, open-label study in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 who have recently started using a GensuPen. Overall, 10,309 patients (mean age: 63 ± 12.0 years; 47.9% female) were analyzed in this study. Of these, 2.5% had used an insulin delivery device before, and for 97.5%, GensuPen was the first delivery device they had used. Most (87.8%) of the patients rated the GensuPen as very good in setting the dose, 92.0% in confirmation of successful insulin administration, 80.9% in trigger location, and 75.0% in force needed for injection. The overall safety of the GensuPen use was high since severe hypoglycemia occurred only in 0.2% of the studied patients. There were 0.6% adverse events, none of which were serious. This real-life observation data shows that the GensuPen was well accepted and safe in this large patient population of adult and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Masierek & Katarzyna Nabrdalik & Hanna Kwiendacz & Tomasz Sawczyn & Janusz Gumprecht, 2020. "A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational, Open-Label Study of the Safety and Comfort of Gensulin ® Delivery Device Use in a Large Cohort of Adult and Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-9, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7587-:d:430940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7587/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7587/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7587-:d:430940. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.