IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7572-d430774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Relevance of Unexpected Findings of Post-Mortem Computed Tomography in Hospitalized Patients: An Observational Study

Author

Listed:
  • Max G. Mentink

    (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht UMC, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Bartholomeus G. H. Latten

    (Department of Pathology, Maastricht UMC, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
    Netherlands Forensic Institute, Laan van Ypenburg 6, 2497 GB The Hague, The Netherlands)

  • Frans C. H. Bakers

    (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht UMC, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Casper Mihl

    (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht UMC, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
    CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Roger J. M. W. Rennenberg

    (Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht UMC, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Bela Kubat

    (Department of Pathology, Maastricht UMC, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands)

  • Paul A. M. Hofman

    (Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht UMC, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Background and objective: The current literature describing the use of minimally invasive autopsy in clinical care is mainly focused on the cause of death. However, the identification of unexpected findings is equally important for the evaluation and improvement of daily clinical care. The purpose of this study was to analyze unexpected post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) findings of hospitalized patients and assess their clinical relevance. Materials and methods: This observational study included patients admitted to the internal medicine ward. Consent for PMCT and autopsy was requested from the next of kin. Decedents were included when consent for at least PMCT was obtained. Consent for autopsy was not obtained for all decedents. All findings reported by PMCT were coded with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code. Unexpected findings were identified and subsequently categorized for their clinical relevance by the Goldman classification. Goldman class I and III were considered clinically relevant. Additionally, correlation with autopsy results and ante-mortem imaging was performed. Results : In total, 120 decedents were included and evaluated for unexpected findings on PMCT. Of them, 57 decedents also underwent an autopsy. A total of 1020 findings were identified; 111 correlated with the cause of death (10.9%), 508 were previously reported (49.8%), 99 were interpreted as post-mortem changes (9.7%), and 302 were classified as unexpected findings (29.6%). After correlation with autopsy (in 57 decedents), 24 clinically relevant unexpected findings remained. These findings were reported in 18 of 57 decedents (32%). Interestingly, 25% of all unexpected findings were not reported by autopsy. Conclusion: Many unexpected findings are reported by PMCT in hospitalized patients, a substantial portion of which is clinically relevant. Additionally, PMCT is able to identify pathology and injuries not reported by conventional autopsy. A combination of PMCT and autopsy can thus be considered a more comprehensive and complete post-mortem examination.

Suggested Citation

  • Max G. Mentink & Bartholomeus G. H. Latten & Frans C. H. Bakers & Casper Mihl & Roger J. M. W. Rennenberg & Bela Kubat & Paul A. M. Hofman, 2020. "Clinical Relevance of Unexpected Findings of Post-Mortem Computed Tomography in Hospitalized Patients: An Observational Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7572-:d:430774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7572/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7572/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7572-:d:430774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.