IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7552-d430410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Translation and Validation of the Modified A-DIVA Scale to European Portuguese: Difficult Intravenous Access Scale for Adult Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Paulo Santos-Costa

    (Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal
    Doutorando em Enfermagem, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal)

  • Liliana B. Sousa

    (Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Fredericus H.J. van Loon

    (Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Catharina Hospital, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands
    Department of Technical and Anesthesia Nursing Sciences, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, 5631 BN Eindhoven, The Netherlands)

  • Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira

    (Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Pedro Parreira

    (Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Margarida Vieira

    (Instituto de Ciências da Saúde (Porto), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal)

  • João Graveto

    (Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, 3004-011 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

(1) Background: In Portugal, no accurate and reliable predictive instruments are known that could assist healthcare professionals in recognizing patients with difficult venous access. Thus, this study aimed to translate and validate the Modified A-DIVA scale to European Portuguese. (2) Methods: A methodological and cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases: translation of the Modified A-DIVA scale to European Portuguese following six stages proposed by Beaton and collaborators, and assessment of its psychometric properties in a non-probability sample of 100 patients who required peripheral intravenous catheterization in a Portuguese hospital. (3) Results: The European version of the Modified A-DIVA scale (A-DM scale) showed excellent inter-rater accordance scores, k = 0.593 (95% CI, 0.847 to 0.970), p < 0.0005. The A-DM scale’s criterion and construct validity was assessed through predictive, convergent, and correlational analysis with variables identified in the literature as associated with difficult peripheral intravenous access, with moderate to large magnitudes and statistical significance. (4) Conclusions: The A-DM scale is a reliable and valid instrument that can support healthcare professionals and researchers in the early identification of patients at risk of difficult peripheral intravenous access. Future validation studies are needed to test the A-DM scale’s applicability across clinical settings and in different patient cohorts.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulo Santos-Costa & Liliana B. Sousa & Fredericus H.J. van Loon & Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira & Pedro Parreira & Margarida Vieira & João Graveto, 2020. "Translation and Validation of the Modified A-DIVA Scale to European Portuguese: Difficult Intravenous Access Scale for Adult Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7552-:d:430410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7552/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7552/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedro Parreira & Beatriz Serambeque & Paulo S. Costa & Lisete S. Mónico & Vânia Oliveira & Liliana B. Sousa & Fernando Gama & Rafael A. Bernardes & David Adriano & Inês A. Marques & Luciene M. Braga &, 2019. "Impact of an Innovative Securement Dressing and Tourniquet in Peripheral Intravenous Catheter-Related Complications and Contamination: An Interventional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Michela Piredda & Jacopo Fiorini & Gabriella Facchinetti & Valentina Biagioli & Anna Marchetti & Fabio Conti & Laura Iacorossi & Diana Giannarelli & Maria Matarese & Maria Grazia De Marinis, 2019. "Risk factors for a difficult intravenous access: A multicentre study comparing nurses' beliefs to evidence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3492-3504, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paulo Santos-Costa & Mariana Alves & Carolina Sousa & Liliana B. Sousa & Filipe Paiva-Santos & Rafael A. Bernardes & Filipa Ventura & Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira & Pedro Parreira & Margarida Vieira & J, 2022. "Nurses’ Involvement in the Development and Usability Assessment of an Innovative Peripheral Intravenous Catheterisation Pack: A Mix-Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Pedro Parreira & Liliana B. Sousa & Inês A. Marques & Paulo Santos-Costa & Sara Cortez & Filipa Carneiro & Arménio Cruz & Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira, 2020. "Study Protocol for Two-Steps Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial: Pre-Clinical Usability Tests for a New Double-Chamber Syringe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-11, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulo Santos-Costa & Mariana Alves & Carolina Sousa & Liliana B. Sousa & Filipe Paiva-Santos & Rafael A. Bernardes & Filipa Ventura & Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira & Pedro Parreira & Margarida Vieira & J, 2022. "Nurses’ Involvement in the Development and Usability Assessment of an Innovative Peripheral Intravenous Catheterisation Pack: A Mix-Method Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Liliana B. Sousa & Paulo Santos-Costa & Inês A. Marques & Arménio Cruz & Anabela Salgueiro-Oliveira & Pedro Parreira, 2020. "Brief Report on Double-Chamber Syringes Patents and Implications for Infusion Therapy Safety and Efficiency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-8, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7552-:d:430410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.