IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7393-d426136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traditional Neuropsychological Testing Does Not Predict Motor-Cognitive Test Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Wilke

    (Department of Sports Medicine & Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60488 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Oliver Vogel

    (Department of Sports Medicine & Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60488 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

  • Sandra Ungricht

    (Department of Sports Medicine & Exercise Physiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60488 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Abstract

The ecological validity of neuropsychological testing (NT) has been questioned in the sports environment. A frequent criticism is that NT, mostly consisting of pen and paper or digital assessments, lacks relevant bodily movement. This study aimed to identify the determinants of a newly developed testing battery integrating both cognitive and motor demands. Twenty active individuals (25 ± 3 years, 11 males) completed the new motor-cognitive testing battery (MC), traditional NT (Stroop test, Trail Making test, Digit Span test) and isolated assessments of motor function (MF; Y-balance test, 20m-sprint, counter-movement jump). Kendal’s tau and partial Spearman correlations were used to detect associations between MC and NT/MF. Except for two items (Reactive Agility A and counter-movement jump; Run-Decide and sprint time; r = 0.37, p < 0.05), MC was not related to MF. Similarly, MC and NT were mostly unrelated, even when controlling for the two significant motor covariates ( p > 0.05). The only MC item with (weak to moderate) associations to NT was the Memory Span test (Digit Span backwards and composite; r = 0.43–0.54, p < 0.05). In sum, motor-cognitive function appears to be largely independent from its two assumed components NT and MF and may represent a new parameter in performance diagnostics.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Wilke & Oliver Vogel & Sandra Ungricht, 2020. "Traditional Neuropsychological Testing Does Not Predict Motor-Cognitive Test Performance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-9, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7393-:d:426136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7393/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7393/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7393-:d:426136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.