IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i1p323-d304573.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)

Author

Listed:
  • Domenico Soriero

    (OU Oncological Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy)

  • Giulia Atzori

    (Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Methodologies, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy)

  • Fabio Barra

    (Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy)

  • Davide Pertile

    (OU Oncological Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy)

  • Andrea Massobrio

    (OU Oncological Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy)

  • Luigi Conti

    (UOC General, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, G. Da Saliceto Hospital, AUSL, 29121 Piacenza, Italy)

  • Dario Gusmini

    (Association of Architects of Bergamo, 24100 Bergamo, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Epis

    (OU Oncological Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy)

  • Maurizio Gallo

    (Department of Internal Medicine (Di.M.I.), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy)

  • Filippo Banchini

    (UOC General, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, G. Da Saliceto Hospital, AUSL, 29121 Piacenza, Italy)

  • Patrizio Capelli

    (UOC General, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, G. Da Saliceto Hospital, AUSL, 29121 Piacenza, Italy)

  • Veronica Penza

    (Biomedical Robotics Lab, Advanced Robotics Department, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16152 Genoa, Italy)

  • Stefano Scabini

    (OU Oncological Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genoa, Italy)

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated that training with a laparoscopic simulator improves laparoscopic technical skills. We describe how to build a homemade, low-cost laparoscopic training simulator (LABOT) and its validation as a training instrument. First, sixty surgeons filled out a survey characterized by 12 closed-answer questions about realism, ergonomics, and usefulness for surgical training (global scores ranged from 1—very insufficient to 5—very good). The results of the questionnaires showed a mean (±SD) rating score of 4.18 ± 0.65 for all users. Then, 15 students (group S) and 15 residents (group R) completed 3 different tasks (T1, T2, T3), which were repeated twice to evaluate the execution time and the number of users’ procedural errors. For T1, the R group had a lower mean execution time and a lower rate of procedural errors than the S group; for T2, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time, but the R group had a lower rate of errors; and for T3, the R and S groups had a similar mean execution time and rate of errors. On a second attempt, all the participants tended to improve their results in doing these surgical tasks; nevertheless, after subgroup analysis of the T1 results, the S group had a better improvement of both parameters. Our laparoscopic simulator is simple to build, low-cost, easy to use, and seems to be a suitable resource for improving laparoscopic skills. In the future, further studies should evaluate the potential of this laparoscopic box on long-term surgical training with more complex tasks and simulation attempts.

Suggested Citation

  • Domenico Soriero & Giulia Atzori & Fabio Barra & Davide Pertile & Andrea Massobrio & Luigi Conti & Dario Gusmini & Lorenzo Epis & Maurizio Gallo & Filippo Banchini & Patrizio Capelli & Veronica Penza , 2020. "Development and Validation of a Homemade, Low-Cost Laparoscopic Simulator for Resident Surgeons (LABOT)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:323-:d:304573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/323/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/323/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matteo Villani & Valentina Lob & Anna Del Prete & Emmanuele Guerra & Elisabetta Chili & Elisabetta Bertellini, 2022. "Description, Organization, and Individual Postgraduate Perspectives of One Italian School of Anesthesia and Intensive Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-10, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:323-:d:304573. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.