IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7309-d424496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Evaluation of a Community-Based Microbial Larviciding Intervention for Malaria Control in Rural Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Berlin Rubin

    (Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

  • Leonard E.G. Mboera

    (SACIDS Foundation for One Health, Sokoine University of Agriculture, 3297 Morogoro, Tanzania)

  • Adriane Lesser

    (Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA)

  • Marie Lynn Miranda

    (Department of Applied and Computational Mathematics and Statistics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA)

  • Randall Kramer

    (Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA)

Abstract

Microbial larviciding can be an effective component of integrated vector management malaria control schemes, although it is not commonly implemented. Moreover, quality control and evaluation of intervention activities are essential to evaluate the potential of community-based larviciding interventions. We conducted a process evaluation of a larval source management intervention in rural Tanzania where local staff were employed to apply microbial larvicide to mosquito breeding habitats with the aim of long-term reductions in malaria transmission. We developed a logic model to guide the process evaluation and then established quantitative indicators to measure intervention success. Quantitative analysis of intervention reach, exposure, and fidelity was performed to assess larvicide application, and interviews with larviciding staff were reviewed to provide context to quantitative results. Results indicate that the intervention was successful in terms of reach, as staff applied microbial larvicide at 80% of identified mosquito breeding habitats. However, the dosage of larvicide applied was sufficient to ensure larval elimination at only 26% of sites, which does not meet the standard set for intervention fidelity. We propose that insufficient training and protocol adaptation, environment and resource issues, and human error contributed to low larvicide application rates. This demonstrates how several small, context-specific details in sum can result in meaningful differences between intervention blueprint and execution. These findings may serve the design of other larval source management interventions by demonstrating the value of additional training, supervision, and measurement and evaluation of protocol adherence.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Berlin Rubin & Leonard E.G. Mboera & Adriane Lesser & Marie Lynn Miranda & Randall Kramer, 2020. "Process Evaluation of a Community-Based Microbial Larviciding Intervention for Malaria Control in Rural Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7309-:d:424496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7309/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7309/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Randall A. Kramer & Leonard E. G. Mboera & Kesheni Senkoro & Adriane Lesser & Elizabeth H. Shayo & Christopher J. Paul & Marie Lynn Miranda, 2014. "A Randomized Longitudinal Factorial Design to Assess Malaria Vector Control and Disease Management Interventions in Rural Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Leonard E. G. Mboera & Randall A. Kramer & Marie Lynn Miranda & Stella P. Kilima & Elizabeth H. Shayo & Adriane Lesser, 2014. "Community Knowledge and Acceptance of Larviciding for Malaria Control in a Rural District of East-Central Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexis Rulisa & Luuk van Kempen & Leon Mutesa & Emmanuel Hakizimana & Chantal M. Ingabire & Fredrick Kateera & Constantianus J. M. Koenraadt & Michèle van Vugt & Bart van den Borne, 2021. "Willingness to Contribute to Bio-Larviciding in the Fight against Malaria: A Contingent Valuation Study among Rice Farmers in Rwanda," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Konstantinos Mitsakakis & Sebastian Hin & Pie Müller & Nadja Wipf & Edward Thomsen & Michael Coleman & Roland Zengerle & John Vontas & Konstantinos Mavridis, 2018. "Converging Human and Malaria Vector Diagnostics with Data Management towards an Integrated Holistic One Health Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7309-:d:424496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.