IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7210-d422862.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a Multi-Level Process Comparison for Process Change Analysis in Cancer Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Angelina Prima Kurniati

    (School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
    School of Computing, Telkom University, Bandung 40257, Indonesia)

  • Ciarán McInerney

    (School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Kieran Zucker

    (School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK)

  • Geoff Hall

    (School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK)

  • David Hogg

    (School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Owen Johnson

    (School of Computing, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

Abstract

The area of process change over time is a particular concern in healthcare, where patterns of care emerge and evolve in response to individual patient needs. We propose a structured approach to analyse process change over time that is suitable for the complex domain of healthcare. Our approach applies a qualitative process comparison at three levels of abstraction: a holistic perspective (process model), a middle-level perspective (trace), and a fine-grained detail (activity). Our aim was to detect change points, localise and characterise the change, and unravel/understand the process evolution. We illustrate the approach using a case study of cancer pathways in Leeds where we found evidence of change points identified at multiple levels. In this paper, we extend our study by analysing the miners used in process discovery and providing a deeper analysis of the activity of investigation in trace and activity levels. In the experiment, we show that this qualitative approach provides a useful understanding of process change over time. Examining change at three levels provides confirmatory evidence of process change where perspectives agree, while contradictory evidence can lead to focused discussions with domain experts. This approach should be of interest to others dealing with processes that undergo complex change over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelina Prima Kurniati & Ciarán McInerney & Kieran Zucker & Geoff Hall & David Hogg & Owen Johnson, 2020. "Using a Multi-Level Process Comparison for Process Change Analysis in Cancer Pathways," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7210-:d:422862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7210/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7210/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7210-:d:422862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.