IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7187-d422274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Knowledge, Attitude, Practices, and Satisfaction of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing among Chinese Pregnant Women under Different Payment Schemes: A Comparative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjun Zhu

    (School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • XiaoXiao Ling

    (Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK)

  • Wenru Shang

    (School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Jiayan Huang

    (School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
    Key Lab of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for aneuploidy screening has been widely applied across China, and costs can affect Chinese pregnant women’s choices. This study aims to assess the knowledge, attitude, practices (KAP) and satisfaction regarding NIPT among pregnant women in China, and to further explore the relationship between payment schemes and women’s acceptability of and satisfaction with NIPT. A questionnaire survey was performed in Shenzhen and Zhengzhou, China, which separately applied “insurance coverage” and “out-of-pocket” payment scheme for NIPT. The major differences between the two cities were compared using chi-square test, Wilcoxon rank sum test, and propensity score matched analysis. Logistic regression models were applied to explore predictors for women’s acceptability and satisfaction. Compared with Zhengzhou participants, a higher proportion of Shenzhen women had heard of NIPT (87.30% vs. 64.03%), were willing to receive NIPT (91.80% vs. 80.43%) and had taken NIPT (83.12% vs. 54.54%), while their satisfaction level was lower. Having NIPT-related knowledge was associated with higher acceptability, and receiving genetic counseling helped to improve satisfaction. Besides, women with higher annual household incomes were more likely to take and be satisfied with NIPT. In conclusion, more attention should be paid to health education, subsidies for NIPT, and genetic counseling.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjun Zhu & XiaoXiao Ling & Wenru Shang & Jiayan Huang, 2020. "The Knowledge, Attitude, Practices, and Satisfaction of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing among Chinese Pregnant Women under Different Payment Schemes: A Comparative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7187-:d:422274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7187/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7187/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7187-:d:422274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.