IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7117-d421114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trunk Flexion Monitoring among Warehouse Workers Using a Single Inertial Sensor and the Influence of Different Sampling Durations

Author

Listed:
  • Micaela Porta

    (Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Massimiliano Pau

    (Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Pier Francesco Orrù

    (Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09123 Cagliari, Italy)

  • Maury A. Nussbaum

    (Department of Industrial and System Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

Abstract

Trunk flexion represents a risk factor for the onset of low-back disorders, yet limited quantitative data exist regarding flexion exposures in actual working conditions. In this study, we evaluated the potential of using a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) to classify trunk flexion, in terms of amplitude, frequency, and duration, and assessed the influence of alternative time durations on exposure results. Twelve warehouse workers were monitored during two hours of an actual shift while wearing a single IMU on their low back. Trunk flexion data were reduced using exposure variation analysis integrated with recommended exposure thresholds. Workers spent 5.1% of their working time with trunk flexion of 30–60° and 2.3% with flexion of 60–90°. Depending on the level of acceptable error, relatively shorter monitoring periods (up to 50 min) might be sufficient to characterize trunk flexion exposures. Future work is needed, however, to determine if these results generalize to other postural exposures and tasks.

Suggested Citation

  • Micaela Porta & Massimiliano Pau & Pier Francesco Orrù & Maury A. Nussbaum, 2020. "Trunk Flexion Monitoring among Warehouse Workers Using a Single Inertial Sensor and the Influence of Different Sampling Durations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7117-:d:421114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7117-:d:421114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.