IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p6946-d417796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inadequate Regulation of the Geological Aspects of Shale Exploitation in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • David K. Smythe

    (College of Science and Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK)

Abstract

Unconventional oil and gas exploitation, which has developed in the UK since 2009, is regulated by four main agencies: The Oil and Gas Authority, the Environment Agency, the Health and Safety Executive and local Mineral Planning Authorities (usually county councils). The British Geological Survey only has an advisory role, as have ad hoc expert committees. I firstly define terms, and summarise the remits of the regulators and background history. Fourteen case histories are then discussed, comprising most of the unconventional exploitation to date; these cases demonstrate the failure of regulation of the geological aspects of fracking operations in the UK. The regulators let inadequacies in geological understanding, and even mendacious geological interpretations by the hydrocarbon operators slip through the net. There are potentially severe implications for environmental safety—if and when permits are granted. Geological pathways, if not properly understood and mitigated, may lead to long-term pollution of groundwater and surface water; methane and H 2 S emissions. Induced earthquakes have not been well regulated. The case histories demonstrate a laissez-faire and frequently incompetent regulatory regime, devised for the pre-unconventional era, and which has no geological oversight or insight.

Suggested Citation

  • David K. Smythe, 2020. "Inadequate Regulation of the Geological Aspects of Shale Exploitation in the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-60, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:6946-:d:417796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/6946/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/6946/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Smythe & Stuart Haszeldine, 2017. "Could fracking creep under the radar?," Nature, Nature, vol. 548(7668), pages 393-393, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:6946-:d:417796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.