IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6914-d417060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chest CT Computerized Aided Quantification of PNEUMONIA Lesions in COVID-19 Infection: A Comparison among Three Commercial Software

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Grassi

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Salvatore Cappabianca

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Urraro

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Beatrice Feragalli

    (Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences—Radiology Unit “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

  • Alessandro Montanelli

    (Laboratory Medicine Unit, ASST Bergamo Est, 24068 Seriate, Italy)

  • Gianluigi Patelli

    (Department of Radiology, ASST Bergamo Est, 24068 Seriate, Italy)

  • Vincenza Granata

    (Radiology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli”, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Giuliana Giacobbe

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Gaetano Maria Russo

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Assunta Grillo

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Angela De Lisio

    (Diagnostic Imaging Unit, “Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale Giuseppe Moscati”, 83100 Avellino, Italy)

  • Cesare Paura

    (Diagnostic Imaging Unit, “Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale Giuseppe Moscati”, 83100 Avellino, Italy)

  • Alfredo Clemente

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Giuliano Gagliardi

    (Diagnostic Imaging Unit, “Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale Giuseppe Moscati”, 83100 Avellino, Italy)

  • Simona Magliocchetti

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Diletta Cozzi

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50139 Firenze, Italy)

  • Roberta Fusco

    (Radiology Division, “Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS di Napoli”, 80131 Naples, Italy)

  • Maria Paola Belfiore

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Roberta Grassi

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, “Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Vittorio Miele

    (Division of Radiodiagnostic, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, 50139 Firenze, Italy)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare different commercial software in the quantification of Pneumonia Lesions in COVID-19 infection and to stratify the patients based on the disease severity using on chest computed tomography (CT) images. Materials and methods: We retrospectively examined 162 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. All cases were evaluated separately by radiologists (visually) and by using three computer software programs: (1) Thoracic VCAR software, GE Healthcare, United States; (2) Myrian, Intrasense, France; (3) InferRead, InferVision Europe, Wiesbaden, Germany. The degree of lesions was visually scored by the radiologist using a score on 5 levels (none, mild, moderate, severe, and critic). The parameters obtained using the computer tools included healthy residual lung parenchyma, ground-glass opacity area, and consolidation volume. Intraclass coefficient (ICC), Spearman correlation analysis, and non-parametric tests were performed. Results: Thoracic VCAR software was not able to perform volumes segmentation in 26/162 (16.0%) cases, Myrian software in 12/162 (7.4%) patients while InferRead software in 61/162 (37.7%) patients. A great variability (ICC ranged for 0.17 to 0.51) was detected among the quantitative measurements of the residual healthy lung parenchyma volume, GGO, and consolidations volumes calculated by different computer tools. The overall radiological severity score was moderately correlated with the residual healthy lung parenchyma volume obtained by ThoracicVCAR or Myrian software, with the GGO area obtained by the ThoracicVCAR tool and with consolidation volume obtained by Myrian software. Quantified volumes by InferRead software had a low correlation with the overall radiological severity score. Conclusions: Computer-aided pneumonia quantification could be an easy and feasible way to stratify COVID-19 cases according to severity; however, a great variability among quantitative measurements provided by computer tools should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Grassi & Salvatore Cappabianca & Fabrizio Urraro & Beatrice Feragalli & Alessandro Montanelli & Gianluigi Patelli & Vincenza Granata & Giuliana Giacobbe & Gaetano Maria Russo & Assunta Grillo , 2020. "Chest CT Computerized Aided Quantification of PNEUMONIA Lesions in COVID-19 Infection: A Comparison among Three Commercial Software," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6914-:d:417060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6914-:d:417060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.