IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6790-d415185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Different Timings of Implant Insertion on the Bone Remodeling Volume around Patients’ Maxillary Single Implants: A 2–3 Years Follow-Up

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Battista Menchini-Fabris

    (Department of Multidisciplinary Regenerative Research, Guglielmo Marconi University, Via Vittoria Colonna, 11, 00193 Rome, Italy
    San Rossore Dental Unit, Viale delle Cascine 152 San Rossore, 56122 Pisa, Italy)

  • Paolo Toti

    (Department of Multidisciplinary Regenerative Research, Guglielmo Marconi University, Via Vittoria Colonna, 11, 00193 Rome, Italy
    Department of Stomatology, Tuscan Stomatological Institute, Foundation for Dental Clinic, Research and Continuing Education, Via Padre Ignazio da Carrara 39, 55042 Forte Dei Marmi, Italy)

  • Giovanni Crespi

    (Department of Stomatology, Tuscan Stomatological Institute, Foundation for Dental Clinic, Research and Continuing Education, Via Padre Ignazio da Carrara 39, 55042 Forte Dei Marmi, Italy)

  • Ugo Covani

    (Department of Stomatology, Tuscan Stomatological Institute, Foundation for Dental Clinic, Research and Continuing Education, Via Padre Ignazio da Carrara 39, 55042 Forte Dei Marmi, Italy)

  • Luca Furlotti

    (Department of Stomatology, Tuscan Stomatological Institute, Foundation for Dental Clinic, Research and Continuing Education, Via Padre Ignazio da Carrara 39, 55042 Forte Dei Marmi, Italy)

  • Roberto Crespi

    (Department of Multidisciplinary Regenerative Research, Guglielmo Marconi University, Via Vittoria Colonna, 11, 00193 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Background : To investigate the middle-term effect on bone remodeling of different timings for different implant placement (immediate versus delayed). Methods : Patients with an anterior maxillary failing tooth were treated by single-crown supported by dental implant. Subjects were retrospectively analyzed for 3 years and assigned to one of two predictor groups: nine immediate versus 10 delayed implant placement (1–2 months after tooth extraction). The crestal bone loss around dental implants was measured with the cone beam computerized tomography by fusing pre-operative and post-operative data. Results: The percentage of volume loss registered at 1-year follow-up (%ΔV) was of 7.5% for the immediate group, which was significantly lower ( p -values ≤ 0.0002) than the loss of 24.2% for the delayed group. At 3 years, there was a significant difference ( p -values = 0.0291) between the two groups, respectively, with a volume loss of 14.6% and 27.1%. When different times were compared, the percentage of the volume loss for the immediate group was different ( p -value = 0.0366) between the first and third year (7.5% and 14.6%, respectively). For the delayed group, no significant difference was registered between the 1- and 3-year follow-up. Conclusions : The bone loss around dental implant-supported single-crown with different timing of insertion appeared higher for the delayed group than the immediate group.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Battista Menchini-Fabris & Paolo Toti & Giovanni Crespi & Ugo Covani & Luca Furlotti & Roberto Crespi, 2020. "Effect of Different Timings of Implant Insertion on the Bone Remodeling Volume around Patients’ Maxillary Single Implants: A 2–3 Years Follow-Up," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6790-:d:415185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6790/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6790/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6790-:d:415185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.