IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6685-d413269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Prescription of Vitamin K Antagonists in a Very Old Population: A Cross-Sectional Study of 8696 Ambulatory Subjects Aged Over 85 Years

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Manckoundia

    (Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, University of Burgundy, 21000 Dijon, France
    UMR Inserm/U1093 Cognition, Action, Sensorimotor Plasticity, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France)

  • Clémentine Rosay

    (Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, University of Burgundy, 21000 Dijon, France)

  • Didier Menu

    (Mutualité Sociale Agricole of Burgundy Franche Comté, 21000 Dijon, France)

  • Valentine Nuss

    (Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, University of Burgundy, 21000 Dijon, France)

  • Anca-Maria Mihai

    (Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, University of Burgundy, 21000 Dijon, France)

  • Jérémie Vovelle

    (Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, University of Burgundy, 21000 Dijon, France)

  • Gilles Nuémi

    (Department of Medical Information, University Hospital, University of Burgundy, 21000 Dijon, France)

  • Philippe d’Athis

    (Department of Medical Information, University Hospital, University of Burgundy, 21000 Dijon, France)

  • Alain Putot

    (Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, University of Burgundy, 21000 Dijon, France)

  • Jérémy Barben

    (Hospital of Champmaillot, University Hospital, University of Burgundy, 21000 Dijon, France)

Abstract

We compared very elderly people taking vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and those not taking VKA (noVKA). Individuals were included in the noVKA group if there was no VKA on their reimbursed prescriptions during the study period. We also compared three subgroups, constituted by VKA type (fluindione, warfarin, or acenocoumarol). We included individuals aged over 85 years, affiliated to Mutualité Sociale Agricole of Burgundy, who were refunded for prescribed VKA in September 2017. The VKA and noVKA groups were compared in terms of demographic conditions, registered chronic diseases (RCD), number of drugs per prescription and cardiovascular medications. The three VKA subgroups were compared for the same items plus laboratory monitoring, novel and refill VKA prescriptions, and prescriber specialty. Of the 8696 included individuals, 1157 (13.30%) were prescribed VKA. Mean age was 90 years. The noVKA group had fewer women (53.67 vs 66.08%), more RCD (93.43 vs. 71.96%) and more drugs per prescription (6.65 vs. 5.18) than the VKA group (all p < 0.01). Except for direct oral anticoagulants and platelet aggregation inhibitors, the VKA group took significantly more cardiovascular medications. The most commonly prescribed VKA was fluindione (59.46%). Mean age was higher in the warfarin (90.42) than in the acenocoumarol (89.83) or fluindione (89.71) subgroups ( p < 0.01). No differences were observed for sex (women were predominant) or RCD. 13% of subjects in this population had a VKA prescription. Fluindione was the most commonly prescribed VKA.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Manckoundia & Clémentine Rosay & Didier Menu & Valentine Nuss & Anca-Maria Mihai & Jérémie Vovelle & Gilles Nuémi & Philippe d’Athis & Alain Putot & Jérémy Barben, 2020. "The Prescription of Vitamin K Antagonists in a Very Old Population: A Cross-Sectional Study of 8696 Ambulatory Subjects Aged Over 85 Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6685-:d:413269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6685/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6685/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6685-:d:413269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.