IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6627-d412228.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Validity of a Choice-Modeling Questionnaire to Analyze the Feasibility of Implementing Physical Activity on Prescription at Primary Health-Care Settings

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Calonge-Pascual

    (ImFINE Research Group, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences-INEF, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/Martín Fierro 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Francisco Fuentes-Jiménez

    (ImFINE Research Group, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences-INEF, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/Martín Fierro 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • José A. Casajús Mallén

    (GENUD Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Pedro Miral s/n, 50008 Zaragoza, Spain
    Biomedical Research Center of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition, CIBERobn, (CB12/03/30038), Carlos III Health Institute, Avenida de Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Marcela González-Gross

    (ImFINE Research Group, Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences-INEF, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, C/Martín Fierro 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain
    Biomedical Research Center of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition, CIBERobn, (CB12/03/30038), Carlos III Health Institute, Avenida de Monforte de Lemos 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Worldwide health policies are trying to implement physical activity on prescription (PAP) at healthcare settings. However, there is not a proper methodology to analyze PHC organizational staff factors. This study aims to validate two questionnaires to assess the self-perception of nurses and general practitioners to implement PAP at primary healthcare (PHC) settings. The designed choice-modeling Google-form questionnaire was sent to 11 expert nurses and 11 expert sports medicine physicians. Experts evaluated each question on a 1–5 points Likert-type scale according to their expertise. Aiken’s V coefficient values ≥0.75 were used to validate separately each question using the Visual Basic-6.0 software. A total of 10 sports medicine physicians and 10 nurses with 28.4 ± 5.1 y and 16.3 ± 11.8 y of PAP experience, respectively, validated the questionnaire. One expert in each group was not considered for offering 3 ± SD answers in ≥2 questions respect to the mean of the rest of experts. Final Aiken’s V coefficient values were 0.89 (0.77–1.00) for the nurses’ questionnaire and 0.84 (0.77–0.95) for the physicians’ one. The questionnaires designed to assess the PAP self-perception of PHC nurses and physicians were validated. This methodology could be used to analyze PHC organizational staff factors in order to achieve an efficient PAP implementation in other PHC contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Calonge-Pascual & Francisco Fuentes-Jiménez & José A. Casajús Mallén & Marcela González-Gross, 2020. "Design and Validity of a Choice-Modeling Questionnaire to Analyze the Feasibility of Implementing Physical Activity on Prescription at Primary Health-Care Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6627-:d:412228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6627/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6627/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6627-:d:412228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.