IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i17p6122-d402774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case Study in a Working Environment Highlighting the Divergence between Sound Level and Workers’ Perception towards Noise

Author

Listed:
  • Chun-Yip Hon

    (School of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

  • Illia Tchernikov

    (Workplace Safety and Prevention Services, Mississauga, ON L4W 0A1, Canada,)

  • Craig Fairclough

    (Workplace Safety and Prevention Services, Mississauga, ON L4W 0A1, Canada,)

  • Alberto Behar

    (SMART Lab., Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)

Abstract

Excessive noise levels are a prevalent issue in food processing operations and, although there have been numerous studies on occupational noise, no single study has used a concurrent mixed-methods approach. Employing this study design allows for an understanding of the level of convergence (similarity) between measured noise levels and workers’ attitudes and perceptions towards noise. This, in turn, allows for the identification of potential challenges with respect to the implementation of hearing conservation efforts. In this study, spot noise measurements were collected using a sound level meter. One-on-one interviews were conducted with workers to determine attitudes and perceptions towards noise in their workplaces. Subsequently, the results of the noise measurements (quantitative data) were integrated with the survey responses (qualitative data) to identify convergence. The majority of the noise measurements were found to exceed 85 dBA—the criterion mandated by the local occupational health and safety legislation. Although all study participants felt that it was noisy in the workplace, a large proportion of respondents indicated that the noise was not bothersome. With workers’ perception being contradictory to the measured noise levels, it is a challenge to implement hearing conservation measures unless changes are made to raise the awareness of the risks associated with excessive noise exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Chun-Yip Hon & Illia Tchernikov & Craig Fairclough & Alberto Behar, 2020. "Case Study in a Working Environment Highlighting the Divergence between Sound Level and Workers’ Perception towards Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6122-:d:402774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6122/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6122/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sridhar Krishnamurti, 2009. "Sensorineural Hearing Loss Associated with Occupational Noise Exposure: Effects of Age-Corrections," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-11, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hillary A. Snapp & Natasha Schaefer Solle & Barbara Millet & Suhrud M. Rajguru, 2022. "Subclinical Hearing Deficits in Noise-Exposed Firefighters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Pengpeng Xie & Yong Peng & Tiantian Wang & Honghao Zhang, 2019. "Risks of Ear Complaints of Passengers and Drivers While Trains Are Passing Through Tunnels at High Speed: A Numerical Simulation and Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Michael Dierickx & Suzanne Verschraegen & Els Wierinck & Guy Willems & Astrid van Wieringen, 2021. "Noise Disturbance and Potential Hearing Loss Due to Exposure of Dental Equipment in Flemish Dentists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6122-:d:402774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.