IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i15p5308-d388689.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Support in Healthcare Redesign Education: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study of Expert Coach and Executive Sponsor Experiences

Author

Listed:
  • Pieter J. Van Dam

    (Tasmanian School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia)

  • Phoebe Griffin

    (Tasmanian School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston 7250, Tasmania, Australia)

  • Gregory M. Peterson

    (School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart 7000, Tasmania, Australia)

  • Nicole S. Reeves

    (Tasmanian School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Burnie 7320, Tasmania, Australia)

  • Lea Kirkwood

    (Agency for Clinical Innovation, New South Wales Health, St Leonards 2065, New South Wales, Australia)

  • Sarah J. Prior

    (Tasmanian School of Medicine, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Burnie 7320, Tasmania, Australia)

Abstract

Healthcare organizations must continue to improve services to meet the rising demand and patient expectations. For this to occur, the health workforce needs to have knowledge and skills to design, implement, and evaluate service improvement interventions. Studies have shown that effective training in health service improvement and redesign combines didactic education with experiential project-based learning and on-the-ground coaching. Project-based learning requires organizational support and oversight, generally through executive sponsorship. A mixed-methods approach, comprising online surveys and semi-structured interviews, was used to explore the experiences of expert coaches and executive sponsors as key facilitators of workplace-based projects undertaken during an Australian postgraduate healthcare redesign course. Fifteen (54%) expert coaches and 37 (20%) executive sponsors completed the online survey. Ten expert coaches and six executive sponsors participated in interviews. The survey data revealed overall positive experiences for coaches and mixed experiences for sponsors. Interview participants expressed a sense of fulfillment that came from working with project teams to deliver a successful project and educational outcomes. However, concerns were raised about adequate resourcing, organizational recognition, competing priorities, and the skills required to effectively coach and sponsor. Expert coaches and executive sponsors sometimes felt under-valued and may benefit from cohort-tailored and evidence-based professional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Pieter J. Van Dam & Phoebe Griffin & Gregory M. Peterson & Nicole S. Reeves & Lea Kirkwood & Sarah J. Prior, 2020. "Organizational Support in Healthcare Redesign Education: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study of Expert Coach and Executive Sponsor Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5308-:d:388689
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5308/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/15/5308/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diana Lungeanu & Alina Petrica & Raluca Lupusoru & Adina Maria Marza & Ovidiu Alexandru Mederle & Bogdan Timar, 2022. "Beyond the Digital Competencies of Medical Students: Concerns over Integrating Data Science Basics into the Medical Curriculum," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-11, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:15:p:5308-:d:388689. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.