IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i14p5262-d387662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlation and Reliability Analyses among the Upper Cervical Rotation-Flexion Test, Upper Cervical Flexion-Extension Test, and Upper Cervical Flexion Angle Measurement Using Radiography

Author

Listed:
  • KwangSun Do

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Korea
    Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary’s Hospital, Incheon 22711, Korea)

  • JaeSung Choi

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Korea)

  • JaeEun Kim

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Gumi University, Gumi-si 39213, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea)

  • JongEun Yim

    (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Korea)

Abstract

(1) Background: The cervical rotation-flexion test is one method of measuring the range of motion of the upper cervical spine; however, this test has not been investigated in detail. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability and concurrent validity of the upper cervical rotation-flexion test. (2) Methods: Twenty-five healthy individuals (13 women and 12 men) participated in this study. The participants underwent radiography, the upper cervical flexion-extension test, and the upper cervical rotation-flexion test in a sitting position while wearing a cervical goniometer to measure the upper cervical flexion angle. Three experienced physical therapists administered the upper cervical rotation-flexion test using the cervical device, twice for each participant. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval). (3) Results: The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability values of the total scores were excellent. The results of the upper cervical rotation-flexion test significantly correlated with those of the radiographic evaluation of the upper cervical flexion angle ( r = 0.80, p < 0.001) and those of the upper cervical flexion-extension test ( r = 0.77, p < 0.001). Significant correlations among the three test results were observed. (4) Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the upper cervical rotation-flexion test is meaningful for independently measuring the upper cervical flexion angle.

Suggested Citation

  • KwangSun Do & JaeSung Choi & JaeEun Kim & JongEun Yim, 2020. "Correlation and Reliability Analyses among the Upper Cervical Rotation-Flexion Test, Upper Cervical Flexion-Extension Test, and Upper Cervical Flexion Angle Measurement Using Radiography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-9, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5262-:d:387662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5262/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5262/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5262-:d:387662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.