IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i14p5182-d386195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational Exposure to Flour Dust. Exposure Assessment and Effectiveness of Control Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Martinelli

    (Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy)

  • Fabiola Salamon

    (Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy)

  • Maria Luisa Scapellato

    (Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy)

  • Andrea Trevisan

    (Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy)

  • Liviano Vianello

    (SPISAL, Azienda ULSS7 Pedemontana, 36061 Bassano del Grappa (VI), Italy)

  • Rosana Bizzotto

    (SPISAL, Azienda ULSS6 Euganea, 35128 Padova, Italy)

  • Maria Angiola Crivellaro

    (Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy)

  • Mariella Carrieri

    (Department of Cardiac Thoracic Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy)

Abstract

The adverse effects associated with exposure to flour dust have been known since the 1700s. The aim of the study was to assess the occupational exposure to flour dust in Italian facilities, identify the activities characterized by the highest exposure, and provide information to reduce workers’ exposure. The study was performed in different facilities such as flourmills ( n = 2), confectioneries ( n = 2), bakeries ( n = 24), and pizzerias ( n = 2). Inhalable flour dust was assessed by personal and area samplings ( n = 250) using IOM (Institute of Occupational Medicine) samplers. The results showed personal occupational exposure to flour dust over the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygiene (ACGIH) and the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limit (SCOEL) occupational limits (mean 1.987 mg/m 3 ; range 0.093–14.055 mg/m 3 ). The levels were significantly higher for dough makers in comparison to the dough formers and packaging area subjects. In four bakeries the industrial hygiene surveys were re-performed after some control measures, such as installation of a sleeve to the end of pipeline, a lid on the mixer tub or local exhaust ventilation system, were installed. The exposure levels were significantly lower than those measured before the introduction of control measures. The exposure level reduction was observed not only in the dough making area but also in all bakeries locals.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Martinelli & Fabiola Salamon & Maria Luisa Scapellato & Andrea Trevisan & Liviano Vianello & Rosana Bizzotto & Maria Angiola Crivellaro & Mariella Carrieri, 2020. "Occupational Exposure to Flour Dust. Exposure Assessment and Effectiveness of Control Measures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5182-:d:386195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5182/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5182/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei He & Nan Jin & Huaxin Deng & Qi Zhao & Fang Yuan & Fengqiong Chen & Huadong Zhang & Xiaoni Zhong, 2022. "Workers’ Occupational Dust Exposure and Pulmonary Function Assessment: Cross-Sectional Study in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-11, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5182-:d:386195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.