IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i14p5107-d384919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Fruit Peels Eco-Enzyme against Enterococcus faecalis : An In Vitro Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hetal Ashvin Kumar Mavani

    (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia)

  • In Meei Tew

    (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia)

  • Lishen Wong

    (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia)

  • Hsu Zenn Yew

    (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia)

  • Alida Mahyuddin

    (Department of Family Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia)

  • Rohi Ahmad Ghazali

    (Department of CITRA & Teaching, Faculty of Health Sciences, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia)

  • Edmond Ho Nang Pow

    (Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 50300, Malaysia
    Division of Restorative Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), an effective endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis (EF), is harmful to periapical tissues. Natural pineapple-orange eco-enzymes (M-EE) and papaya eco-enzyme (P-EE) could be potential alternatives. This study aimed to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of M-EE and P-EE at different concentrations and fermentation periods against EF, compared to 2.5% NaOCl. Fermented M-EE and P-EE (3 and 6 months) at various concentrations were mixed with EF in a 96-well plate incubated for 24 h anaerobically. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of M-EE and P-EE were determined via EF growth observation. EF inhibition was quantitatively measured and compared between different irrigants using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and different fermentation periods using the independent-samples T-test. M-EE and P-EE showed MIC at 50% and MBC at 100% concentrations. There was no significant difference in antimicrobial effect when comparing M-EE and P-EE at 50% and 100% to 2.5% NaOCl. P-EE at 6 months fermentation exhibited higher EF inhibition compared to 3 months at concentrations of 25% ( p = 0.017) and 0.78% ( p = 0.009). The antimicrobial properties of M-EE and P-EE, at both 100% and 50% concentrations, are comparable to 2.5% NaOCl. They could therefore be potential alternative endodontic irrigants, but further studies are required.

Suggested Citation

  • Hetal Ashvin Kumar Mavani & In Meei Tew & Lishen Wong & Hsu Zenn Yew & Alida Mahyuddin & Rohi Ahmad Ghazali & Edmond Ho Nang Pow, 2020. "Antimicrobial Efficacy of Fruit Peels Eco-Enzyme against Enterococcus faecalis : An In Vitro Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5107-:d:384919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5107-:d:384919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.