IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i14p4944-d382199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of Acute and Sub-Acute Effects of Auditory Training on the Central Auditory Processing in Older Adults with Hearing Loss—A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Carla Matos Silva

    (Departamento de Audiologia, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTeSC-Coimbra Health School, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal
    LABINSAÚDE-Laboratório de Investigação em Ciências Aplicadas à Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTeSC, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal
    School of Arts and Humanities, Centro de Linguística da Universidade de Lisboa, University of Lisbon, 1649-004 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Carolina Fernandes

    (MiniSom, uma marca amplifon, 1050-148 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Clara Rocha

    (Departamento das Ciências Complementares, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTeSC-Coimbra Health School, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal
    INESC Coimbra, Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra, University of Coimbra, 3000-033 Coimbra, Portugal)

  • Telmo Pereira

    (LABINSAÚDE-Laboratório de Investigação em Ciências Aplicadas à Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTeSC, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal
    Departamento de Fisiologia Clínica, Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTeSC-Coimbra Health School, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal)

Abstract

Background: Impairment in speech perception is a common feature of older adults. This study aimed at evaluating the acute and sub-acute (after three months) effects of auditory training on central auditory processing in older people with hearing loss. Methods: A nonrandomized study was conducted enrolling 15 older adults with hearing loss and an average age of 78.6 ± 10.9 years. All participants underwent a baseline otoscopy, tympanogram, audiogram and speech-in-noise test with a signal-noise ratio (SNR) of 10 and 15 dB. Afterwards, auditory training intervention was implemented consisting of 10 training sessions over 5 weeks. Participants were divided into two groups: group 1 (G1) underwent auditory training based on a speech-in-noise test; group 2 (G2) underwent a filtered-speech test. Auditory processing was evaluated at baseline (T0) immediately after the intervention (T1) and 3 months after the intervention (T2). Results: Group 1 were quite efficient regardless of the SNR in the right ear with statistically significant differences from T0 to T1 ( p = 0.003 and p = 0.006 for 10 dB and 15 dB, respectively) and T0 to T2 ( p = 0.011 and 0.015 for 10 dB and 15 dB, respectively). As for the left ear, the increase of success was statistically significant for the SNR of 10 dB and 15 dB from T0 to T1 ( p = 0.001 and p = 0.014, respectively) and from T0 to T2 ( p = 0.016 and p = 0.003). In G2, there was a significant variation only from T0 for T1 in the left ear for an SNR of 10 dB ( p = 0.001). Conclusion: Speech perception in noise significantly improved after auditory training in old adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Carla Matos Silva & Carolina Fernandes & Clara Rocha & Telmo Pereira, 2020. "Study of Acute and Sub-Acute Effects of Auditory Training on the Central Auditory Processing in Older Adults with Hearing Loss—A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:4944-:d:382199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/4944/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/4944/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:4944-:d:382199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.