IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4893-d381282.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Different Cadence on Paddling Gross Efficiency and Economy in Stand-Up Paddle Boarding

Author

Listed:
  • Arkaitz Castañeda-Babarro

    (Health, Physical Activity and Sports Science Laboratory, Department of Physical Activity and Sports, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, 48007 Bizkaia, Spain
    Physiotherapy Department, Institute of Biomedicine (IBIOMED), University of Leon, Campus de Vegazana, 24071 Leon, Spain)

  • Jordan Santos-Concejero

    (Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Aitor Viribay

    (Glut4Science, Physiology, Nutrition and Sport, 01004 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain)

  • Borja Gutiérrez-Santamaría

    (Health, Physical Activity and Sports Science Laboratory, Department of Physical Activity and Sports, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, 48007 Bizkaia, Spain)

  • Juan Mielgo-Ayuso

    (Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, 42004 Soria, Spain)

Abstract

Background: Due to the importance of energy efficiency and economy in endurance performance, it is important to know the influence of different paddling cadences on these variables in the stand-up paddleboarding (SUP). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of paddling at different cadences on the energy efficiency, economy, and physiological variables of international SUP race competitors. Methods: Ten male paddlers (age 28.8 ± 11.0 years; height 175.4 ± 5.1 m; body mass 74.2 ± 9.4 kg) participating in international tests carried out two test sessions. In the first one, an incremental exercise test was conducted to assess maximal oxygen uptake and peak power output (PPO). On the second day, they underwent 3 trials of 8 min each at 75% of PPO reached in the first test session. Three cadences were carried out in different trials randomly assigned between 45–55 and 65 strokes-min −1 (spm). Heart rate (HR), blood lactate, perceived sense of exertion (RPE), gross efficiency, economy, and oxygen uptake (VO 2 ) were measured in the middle (4-min) and the end (8-min) of each trial. Results: Economy (45.3 ± 5.7 KJ·l −1 at 45 spm vs. 38.1 ± 5.3 KJ·l −1 at 65 spm; p = 0.010) and gross efficiency (13.4 ± 2.3% at 45 spm vs. 11.0 ± 1.6% at 65 spm; p = 0.012) was higher during de 45 spm condition than 65 spm in the 8-min. Respiratory exchange ratio (RER) presented a lower value at 4-min than at 8-min in 55 spm (4-min, 0.950 ± 0.065 vs. 8-min, 0.964 ± 0.053) and 65 spm cadences (4-min, 0.951 ± 0.030 vs. 8-min, 0.992 ± 0.047; p < 0.05). VO 2 , HR, lactate, and RPE were lower ( p < 0.05) at 45 spm (VO 2 , 34.4 ± 6.0 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ; HR, 161.2 ± 16.4 beats·min −1 ; lactate, 3.5 ± 1.0 mmol·l −1 ; RPE, 6.0 ± 2.1) than at 55 spm (VO 2 , 38.6 ± 5.2 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ; HR, 168.1 ± 15.1 beats·min −1 ; lactate, 4.2 ± 1.2 mmol·l −1 ; RPE, 6.9 ± 1.4) and 65 spm (VO 2 , 38.7 ± 5.9 mL·kg −1 ·min −1 ; HR, 170.7 ± 13.0 beats·min −1 ; 5.3 ± 1.8 mmol·l −1 ; RPE, 7.6 ± 1.4) at 8-min. Moreover, lactate and RPE at 65 spm was greater than 55 spm ( p < 0.05) at 8-min. Conclusion: International male SUP paddlers were most efficient and economical when paddling at 45 spm vs. 55 or 65 spm, confirmed by lower RPE values, which may likely translate to faster paddling speed and greater endurance.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkaitz Castañeda-Babarro & Jordan Santos-Concejero & Aitor Viribay & Borja Gutiérrez-Santamaría & Juan Mielgo-Ayuso, 2020. "The Effect of Different Cadence on Paddling Gross Efficiency and Economy in Stand-Up Paddle Boarding," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4893-:d:381282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4893/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4893/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4893-:d:381282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.