IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4700-d378296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management and Recommendations for the Prevention of Fatal Foreign Body Aspiration: Four Cases Aged 1.5 to 3 Years and Mini-Review of the Literature

Author

Listed:
  • Angelo Montana

    (Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies G.F. Ingrassia, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 87 Edificio B, 95123 Catania, Italy)

  • Monica Salerno

    (Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies G.F. Ingrassia, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 87 Edificio B, 95123 Catania, Italy)

  • Alessandro Feola

    (Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Luciano Armanni 5, 80138 Naples, Italy)

  • Alessio Asmundo

    (Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine—Dermatology, University of Messina, “G. Martino” Hospital, 98124 Messina, Italy)

  • Nunzio Di Nunno

    (Department of History Society and Human Studies, University of Salento-Lecce, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Filomena Casella

    (Forensic Medicine, Department of Law, Magna Grecia, University of Catanzaro, 81100 Catanzaro, Italy)

  • Emilpaolo Manno

    (Emergency Department, Maria Vittoria Hospital-Torino, 10144 Torino, Italy)

  • Federica Colosimo

    (Forensic Medicine, Department of Law, Magna Grecia, University of Catanzaro, 81100 Catanzaro, Italy)

  • Raffaele Serra

    (Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 81100 Catanzaro, Italy)

  • Giulio Di Mizio

    (Forensic Medicine, Department of Law, Magna Grecia, University of Catanzaro, 81100 Catanzaro, Italy)

Abstract

(1) Background: Foreign body aspiration (FBA) is a significant public health concern among the pediatric population, and fatalities are dramatic for families. It typically involves organic foreign bodies (mainly food) aspirated by children under three years old, usually at home or school. This review aimed to focus on the preventive measures around four actual cases of fatal foreign body aspiration, emphasizing the correct execution of the Heimlich maneuver and cardiopulmonary resuscitation, supervised mealtimes, and high-risk foods. (2) Methods: Four fatal cases of foreign body aspiration in children are presented here. The children were in a free environment, such as school, home, and the countryside, and were in the presence of teachers, parents, and a grandmother who did not supervise the children adequately. A literature review was performed via the MEDLINE database using the key terms: “foreign body aspiration,” “infant choking, 1.5 to 3 years,” “food and foreign body aspiration,” “common household,” “prevention of foreign body aspiration,” “guidelines,” “recommendations,” “training of caregivers (parents, educators),” “resuscitation,” “Heimlich maneuver,” and “disengagement of the upper airways.” We focused on the prevention of foreign body aspiration. (3) Results: a complete postmortem examination was performed. In three cases, the foreign bodies were food (mozzarella cheese, pear, or raw bean), while in one case, the foreign body was a pebble. (4) Conclusions: This review aimed to discuss recent scientific literature and provide a perspective on the benefits of a dedicated approach to the management of fatal foreign body aspiration in children by caregivers who usually have no experience with the best ways of supervising children in a safe environment, especially regarding the correct execution of resuscitation maneuvers, such as the Heimlich maneuver. Recommendation updates could improve healthcare quality in a pediatric setting and reduce medico-legal implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Angelo Montana & Monica Salerno & Alessandro Feola & Alessio Asmundo & Nunzio Di Nunno & Filomena Casella & Emilpaolo Manno & Federica Colosimo & Raffaele Serra & Giulio Di Mizio, 2020. "Risk Management and Recommendations for the Prevention of Fatal Foreign Body Aspiration: Four Cases Aged 1.5 to 3 Years and Mini-Review of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4700-:d:378296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4700/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4700/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raffaele La Russa & Stefano Ferracuti, 2022. "Clinical Risk Management: As Modern Tool for Prevention and Management of Care and Prevention Occupational Risk," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-2, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4700-:d:378296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.