IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4649-d377434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Nieri

    (Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Orthodontics, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50127 Firenze, Italy)

  • Veronica Giuntini

    (School of Dentistry, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50127 Firenze, Italy)

  • Umberto Pagliaro

    (School of Dentistry, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50127 Firenze, Italy
    Private Practice, Campi Bisenzio, 50013 Firenze, Italy)

  • Monica Giani

    (Private Practice, Campi Bisenzio, 50013 Firenze, Italy)

  • Lorenzo Franchi

    (School of Dentistry, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50127 Firenze, Italy
    Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA)

  • Debora Franceschi

    (School of Dentistry, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Università degli Studi di Firenze, 50127 Firenze, Italy)

Abstract

Background : The aim of this single-use, four-treatment, four-period (visit), cross-over, mono-centered, examiner-blind, cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy in dental plaque removal of a U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (U) compared to a conventional powered toothbrush (P), a habitual toothbrushing procedure (H), and no brushing (N). Methods : Eligible participants were volunteer students. Primary outcome measure was the reduction in full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) after brushing. The secondary outcome variable was a visual analogic scale (VAS) on subjective clean mouth sensation. Mixed models were performed for difference in FMPS and VAS. Results : Twenty-two participants were randomized to the treatments in the four periods of the study. The differences between treatments in FMPS reduction after brushing were statistically significant ( p < 0.0001). The differences were statistically significant between the U and P groups (difference −48; 95% CI from −54 to −41) favoring the P group, and between the U and H groups (difference −45; 95% CI from −52 to −39) favoring the H group. On the contrary, the difference between the U and N groups was not significant (difference 5; 95% CI from −2 to 12) favoring the U group. The differences between treatments in clean mouth VAS was statistically significant ( p < 0.0001) favoring the P and H groups. Conclusions : The U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush tested in this study proved to be not effective in removing dental plaque.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Nieri & Veronica Giuntini & Umberto Pagliaro & Monica Giani & Lorenzo Franchi & Debora Franceschi, 2020. "Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-8, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4649-:d:377434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4649/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4649/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4649-:d:377434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.