IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i12p4195-d370614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparisons of Dipstick Test, Urine Protein-to-Creatine Ratio, and Total Protein Measurement for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Stefańska

    (Department of Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland
    These authors equally contributed to this study.)

  • Maciej Zieliński

    (Department of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland
    These authors equally contributed to this study.)

  • Dorota Zamkowska

    (Department of Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Przemysław Adamski

    (Department of Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Joanna Jassem-Bobowicz

    (Department of Neonatology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Karolina Piekarska

    (Department of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Martyna Jankowiak

    (Department of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Leszczyńska

    (Department of Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Renata Świątkowska-Stodulska

    (Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Preis

    (Department of Obstetrics, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Piotr Trzonkowski

    (Department of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Natalia Marek-Trzonkowska

    (Cancer Immunology Group, International Centre for Cancer Vaccine Science, University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland
    Laboratory of Immunoregulation and Cellular Therapies, Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland)

Abstract

Preeclampsia affects 2–5% of pregnant women and is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. We aimed to extensively evaluate proteinuria in women with preeclampsia and to determine the analytical sensitivity and specificity of and the cutoff values for urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) and total protein in 24 h urine samples. This study included 88 women. We used the urine dipstick test, UPCR, and total protein measurement in a 24 h urine sample. The patients were divided in gestational hypertension (GH, n = 44) and preeclampsia (PE, n = 44) groups. In the GH group, 25% (11/44) of the patients presented incidentally positive results. UPCR and total protein in 24 h urine specimens were increased in the GH group compared to the PE group. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed a UPCR cutoff of 30 mg/mmol as significant for preeclampsia, while the sensitivity and specificity were 89% (95% CI, 75–97) and 100% (95% CI, 87–100), respectively. In the 24 h urine protein test, sensitivity and specificity were 80% (95% CI, 61–92) and 100% (95% CI, 88–100), respectively, for the cutoff value of 0.26 g/24 h. In comparison to the other commonly used tests here considered, UPCR determination is a reliable, relatively faster, and equally accurate method for the quantitation of proteinuria, correlates well with 24 h urine protein estimations, and could be used as an alternative to the 24 h proteinuria test for the diagnosis of preeclampsia.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Stefańska & Maciej Zieliński & Dorota Zamkowska & Przemysław Adamski & Joanna Jassem-Bobowicz & Karolina Piekarska & Martyna Jankowiak & Katarzyna Leszczyńska & Renata Świątkowska-Stodulska , 2020. "Comparisons of Dipstick Test, Urine Protein-to-Creatine Ratio, and Total Protein Measurement for the Diagnosis of Preeclampsia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-9, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:12:p:4195-:d:370614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4195/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4195/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:12:p:4195-:d:370614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.