IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p3927-d366017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Patterns of Skill Actions between Analog and Electronic Protectors in Taekwondo: A Log-Linear Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Eun-Hyung Cho

    (Korea Institute of Sport Science, Seoul 01794, Korea)

  • Han-Joo Eom

    (College of Sport Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea)

  • Se-Yong Jang

    (Department of Physical Education, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the patterns of skill actions executed during Taekwondo competitions when wearing and not wearing an electronic protector. To achieve this purpose, 110 matches from two university-level Taekwondo championships were taped and analyzed. The performance skills were composed of 18 detailed skills and grouped into five categories by considering kicks to the target area (chest or head/face). The data were organized in the form of a contingency table that demonstrated the relationship between grouping factors (skills, protectors, win–lose, and weight division). A log-linear analysis was carried out to investigate the effect of the grouping factors (IVs) on the skills (DV) using SPSS Statistics. The results obtained in the present study can be summarized as follows. First, the overall proportion of “points” called by the judge for the general protector (32.3%) was approximately 3.4 times that for the electronic protector (9.5%). Second, for the electronic protector, the proportions of kicks to the chest area were in the following order: Roundhouse kick (R-Kick) (44.7%), Pushing kick (P-kick) (19.3%), Turn kick (T-kick) (8.7%), and Double roundhouse kick (DR-kick) (7.6%). For the general protector, the order differed slightly, with T-kick and P-kick switched around with different proportions. Third, the proportion of kicks to the head/face was higher for the electronic protector (19.8%) than for the general protector (10.4%), and this difference was even more distinct when the light (−68kg) (33.5% (electronic) vs. 6.5% (general)) and heavy (+85kg) (1.4% (electronic) vs. 13.3% (general)) weight divisions were compared. Finally, the match status (win/lose) had no significant effect on the pattern of playing actions for both the protectors. The result from this study suggests that skill frequency of linear simple movement for activating electrical protector’s sensor is increased, while the one of rotational complex movement is decreased gradually. Additionally, headgear without sensors, such as for a hit movement to the face/head part, represent characteristics of increased attack skills to the facial area; these scores are provided through subjective judgement, and consequently changes in performance skills can occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Eun-Hyung Cho & Han-Joo Eom & Se-Yong Jang, 2020. "Comparison of Patterns of Skill Actions between Analog and Electronic Protectors in Taekwondo: A Log-Linear Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3927-:d:366017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3927/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3927/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3927-:d:366017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.