IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p3772-d363167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits for Older People Engaged in Environmental Volunteering and Socializing Activities in City Parks: Preliminary Results of a Program in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Gagliardi

    (Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA—National Institute of Health & Science on Ageing, 60124 Ancona, Italy)

  • Karl Pillemer

    (Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA)

  • Elena Gambella

    (Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA—National Institute of Health & Science on Ageing, 60124 Ancona, Italy)

  • Flavia Piccinini

    (Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS INRCA—National Institute of Health & Science on Ageing, 60124 Ancona, Italy)

  • Paolo Fabbietti

    (Laboratory of Geriatric Pharmacoepidemiology, IRCCS INRCA—National Institute of Health & Science on Ageing, 60124 Ancona, Italy)

Abstract

The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the feasibility of an environmental volunteering program involving park restoration and social activities for older people. Older people face a series of challenges, ranging from social isolation and depression to a lack of exercise, as well as the difficult task of creating new meaning to deal with a decrease in vitality and new social relationships, interests, and commitments. From this perspective, this pilot study aimed to contribute to highlighting if or how these aspects can be positively correlated with organized activities associated with caring for public green spaces. A single-group, pre-test/post-test design was used, and baseline and post-participation measurements were recorded. The data were collected using a questionnaire aimed at evaluating variations in physical activity, positive and negative emotions, life satisfaction, and perceived social support. Through focus group interviews with participants at the baseline and after one year of participating in the program, the participants’ motivations and experienced effects were explored. The sample was composed of a group of 19 healthy people who joined the program. The quantitative results showed that the participants’ level of physical activity, subjective life satisfaction, and positive feelings were significantly increased at the follow-up. Positive correlations were found between increasing moderate physical activities, walking, and The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) positive feelings. A pro-environmental attitude of the elderly emerged from the qualitative data. The results, limitations, and improvements of the study are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Gagliardi & Karl Pillemer & Elena Gambella & Flavia Piccinini & Paolo Fabbietti, 2020. "Benefits for Older People Engaged in Environmental Volunteering and Socializing Activities in City Parks: Preliminary Results of a Program in Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3772-:d:363167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3772/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3772/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter A. Coventry & Chris Neale & Alison Dyke & Rachel Pateman & Steve Cinderby, 2019. "The Mental Health Benefits of Purposeful Activities in Public Green Spaces in Urban and Semi-Urban Neighbourhoods: A Mixed-Methods Pilot and Proof of Concept Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohan R. Tanniru & Nimit Agarwal & Amanda Sokan & Salim Hariri, 2021. "An Agile Digital Platform to Support Population Health—A Case Study of a Digital Platform to Support Patients with Delirium Using IoT, NLP, and AI," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Liat Ayalon & Natalie Ulitsa & Hanan AboJabel & Shelly Engdau, 2022. "Older Persons’ Perceptions concerning Climate Activism and Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Results from a Qualitative Study of Diverse Population Groups of Older Israelis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Cristina Gagliardi & Giovanni Lamura, 2021. "Special Issue on “Advances in Socio-Economic Research on Ageing”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-6, June.
    4. Ying Xu & Sarah Ann Wheeler & Alec Zuo, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Participation and Physical Activities in Parks: A Systematic Review of the Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xialu Wu & Yu-Sheng Shen & Shenghui Cui, 2023. "Global Trends in Green Space and Senior Mental Health Studies: Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Arnau Carreño & Mireia Gascon & Cristina Vert & Josep Lloret, 2020. "The Beneficial Effects of Short-Term Exposure to Scuba Diving on Human Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Cristina Ayala-Azcarraga & Daniel Diaz & Tania Fernandez & Fernando Cordova-Tapia & Luis Zambrano, 2023. "Uneven Distribution of Urban Green Spaces in Relation to Marginalization in Mexico City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Sebastian Hinde & Laura Bojke & Peter Coventry, 2021. "The Cost Effectiveness of Ecotherapy as a Healthcare Intervention, Separating the Wood from the Trees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Vincenza Gianfredi & Maddalena Buffoli & Andrea Rebecchi & Roberto Croci & Aurea Oradini-Alacreu & Giuseppe Stirparo & Alessio Marino & Anna Odone & Stefano Capolongo & Carlo Signorelli, 2021. "Association between Urban Greenspace and Health: A Systematic Review of Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3772-:d:363167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.