IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3699-d362303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Martínez-Gómez

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Pedro L. Valenzuela

    (Department of Systems Biology, University of Alcalá, 28805 Madrid, Spain
    Department of Sport and Health, Spanish Agency for Health Protection in Sport (AEPSAD), 28016 Madrid, Spain
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Lidia B. Alejo

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
    Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28009 Madrid, Spain)

  • Jaime Gil-Cabrera

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Almudena Montalvo-Pérez

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Eduardo Talavera

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • Alejandro Lucia

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain
    Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), 28009 Madrid, Spain)

  • Susana Moral-González

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

  • David Barranco-Gil

    (Faculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, 28670 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the physiological variables that predict competition performance during a CrossFit competition. Fifteen male amateur CrossFit athletes (age, 35 ± 9 years; CrossFit experience, 40 ± 27 months) performed a series of laboratory-based tests (incremental load test for deep full squat and bench press; squat, countermovement and drop jump tests; and incremental running and Wingate tests) that were studied as potential predictors of CrossFit performance. Thereafter, they performed the five Workouts of the Day (WODs) corresponding to the CrossFit Games Open 2019, and we assessed the relationship between the laboratory-based markers and CrossFit performance with regression analyses. Overall CrossFit performance (i.e., final ranking considering the sum of all WODs, as assessed by number of repetitions, time spent in exercises or weight lifted) was significantly related to jump ability, mean and peak power output during the Wingate test, relative maximum strength for the deep full squat and the bench press, and maximum oxygen uptake (VO 2max ) and speed during the incremental test (all p < 0.05, r = 0.58–0.75). However, the relationship between CrossFit Performance and most laboratory markers varied depending on the analyzed WOD. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that measures of lower-body muscle power (particularly jump ability) and VO 2max explained together most of the variance (R 2 = 81%, p < 0.001) in overall CrossFit performance. CrossFit performance is therefore associated with different power-, strength-, and aerobic-related markers.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Martínez-Gómez & Pedro L. Valenzuela & Lidia B. Alejo & Jaime Gil-Cabrera & Almudena Montalvo-Pérez & Eduardo Talavera & Alejandro Lucia & Susana Moral-González & David Barranco-Gil, 2020. "Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3699-:d:362303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomás Ponce-García & Javier Benítez-Porres & Jerónimo Carmelo García-Romero & Alejandro Castillo-Domínguez & José Ramón Alvero-Cruz, 2021. "The Anaerobic Power Assessment in CrossFit ® Athletes: An Agreement Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Antonio Cejudo, 2022. "Predicting the Clean Movement Technique in Crossfit ® Athletes Using an Optimal Upper-Limb Range of Motion: A Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Marcos Jusdado-García & Rubén Cuesta-Barriuso, 2021. "Soft Tissue Mobilization and Stretching for Shoulder in CrossFitters: A Randomized Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-10, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3699-:d:362303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.