IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3645-d361574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Usefulness of the Inhibitory Control Test (ICT) in the Diagnosis of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Stawicka

    (Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-540 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Jerzy Jaroszewicz

    (Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-540 Bialystok, Poland
    Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland)

  • Justyna Zbrzeźniak

    (Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-540 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Natalia Sołowianowicz

    (Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-540 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Aleksandra Woszczenko

    (Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-540 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Magdalena Świderska

    (Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-540 Bialystok, Poland)

  • Robert Flisiak

    (Department of Infectious Diseases and Hepatology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-540 Bialystok, Poland)

Abstract

Background : Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) refers to a number of neuropsychiatric and neurophysiological disorders in patients with cirrhosis who do not show abnormalities on physical examination or in clinical tests. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and predictive value of minimal hepatic encephalopathy and the usefulness of the inhibitory control test (ICT) in the diagnosis. Methods : Seventy patients (mean age 53 years, range 24−77) with liver cirrhosis were enrolled in the study. MHE was diagnosed based on PHES (psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score) and ICT. PHES and ICT were validated in a group of 56 control subjects. Results : Minimal hepatic encephalopathy was diagnosed using PHES in 21 patients (30%). ICT diagnosed MHE in 30 patients (42%), and the test had a sensitivity of 65% and a specificity of 57% compared to PHES. The ICT score (lures/target accuracy rate) correlated with the age of subjects (R = 0.35, p = 0.002) and only slightly with education (education in years R = −0.22, p = 0.06). MHE diagnosed with PHES or ICT was associated with a significantly higher model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in the follow-up. MHE diagnosed with ICT was correlated with a significantly higher incidence of symptoms of decompensated cirrhosis ( p = 0.02) in the follow-up. Conclusions : ICT had moderate sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing MHE compared to PHES. Importantly, MHE detected with PHES or ICT was associated with poorer survival and a more severe progression of the disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Stawicka & Jerzy Jaroszewicz & Justyna Zbrzeźniak & Natalia Sołowianowicz & Aleksandra Woszczenko & Magdalena Świderska & Robert Flisiak, 2020. "Clinical Usefulness of the Inhibitory Control Test (ICT) in the Diagnosis of Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-8, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3645-:d:361574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3645/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3645/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3645-:d:361574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.