IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i10p3419-d357966.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No Benefit of a Pediatric Screening in Discovering Reduced Visual Acuity in Children: Experiences from a Cross-Sectional Study in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Heike M. Elflein

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
    shared first authorship.)

  • Roman Pokora

    (Division of Paediatric Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
    Ministry for Social Affairs, Labour, Health and Demography of Rhineland-Palatinate, Department of Public Health Services, Hygiene and Infection Control, 55131 Mainz, Germany
    shared first authorship.)

  • Denis F. Müller

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany)

  • Klaus Jahn

    (Ministry for Social Affairs, Labour, Health and Demography of Rhineland-Palatinate, Department of Public Health Services, Hygiene and Infection Control, 55131 Mainz, Germany)

  • Katharina A. Ponto

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany)

  • Susanne Pitz

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Bürgerhospital und Clementine Kinderhospital, 60318 Frankfurt/Main, Germany)

  • Norbert Pfeiffer

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany)

  • Alexander K. Schuster

    (Department of Ophthalmology, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
    shared last authorship.)

  • Michael S. Urschitz

    (Division of Paediatric Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
    shared last authorship.)

Abstract

Background: The newly introduced German pediatric screening examination at the end of the third year of life (U7a) incorporates visual function testing in particular; there is no ophthalmic screening during childhood in Germany. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between participation in U7a and visual function at the preschool health examination (PHE) in the sixth year of life. Methods: This study evaluated PHE data from school enrollment years 2009/2010 to 2014/2015 of Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. Visual acuity (VA) at PHE was assessed with Rodenstock visual acuity test device (tumbling E) wearing glasses if present. The relationship between participation in U7a and VA <0.7 at PHE was calculated for reduced monocular and binocular VA using multiple logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders. Results: Data from 189,704 children (91,041 girls) in 35 out of 36 districts were included. The first children to participate in U7a were enrolled in 2011/2012 school year. In total, 90,339 children (47.6%) had U7a before PHE, while 99,365 (52.4%) had not. VA <0.7 in at least one eye was measured at PHE in 8429 (4.4%) children, and in both eyes in 4345 (2.3%) children. Participation in U7a was not associated with VA <0.7 at PHE (odds ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.94–1.04). Conclusions: The proportion of children with VA <0.7 at PHE was high. No beneficial effect of newly introduced German U7a pediatric screening examination was found for reduced VA at PHE.

Suggested Citation

  • Heike M. Elflein & Roman Pokora & Denis F. Müller & Klaus Jahn & Katharina A. Ponto & Susanne Pitz & Norbert Pfeiffer & Alexander K. Schuster & Michael S. Urschitz, 2020. "No Benefit of a Pediatric Screening in Discovering Reduced Visual Acuity in Children: Experiences from a Cross-Sectional Study in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-10, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3419-:d:357966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3419/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/10/3419/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:10:p:3419-:d:357966. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.