IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2019i1p140-d301416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Post-Reprocessing Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Effective in Reducing the Potential Risk in Transmitting Pathogens?

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Luisa Cristina

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genova, Italy
    S.S.D. U.O. Hospital Hygiene, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genova, Italy)

  • Marina Sartini

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genova, Italy
    S.S.D. U.O. Hospital Hygiene, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genova, Italy)

  • Elisa Schinca

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genova, Italy
    S.S.D. U.O. Hospital Hygiene, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genova, Italy)

  • Gianluca Ottria

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genova, Italy
    S.S.D. U.O. Hospital Hygiene, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genova, Italy)

  • Chiara Dupont

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genova, Italy)

  • Palmira Bova

    (S.C. Gastroenterology, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genova, Italy)

  • Gianni Coccia

    (S.C. Gastroenterology, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genova, Italy)

  • Beatrice Casini

    (Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy)

  • Anna Maria Spagnolo

    (Department of Health Sciences, University of Genova, Via Pastore 1, 16132 Genova, Italy
    S.S.D. U.O. Hospital Hygiene, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genova, Italy)

Abstract

Background: The use of a contaminated endoscope may lead to infections due to the transmission of potential pathogens from patient to patient. Methods: Post-reprocessing microbiological surveillance of four duodenoscopes was carried out over a three-year period in the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of an Italian hospital. Sampling of duodenoscopes was performed after the devices have been reprocessed. The initial phase of surveillance involved the contemporary evaluation of the four duodenoscopes; afterwards, microbiological surveillance proceeded at monthly intervals. Results: The initial phase of surveillance revealed that three duodenoscopes presented a high level of contamination with “high-concern” micro-organisms, some of which were multi-drug-resistant. The highest values of contamination regarded the species P. aeruginosa (2500 CFU/duodenoscope), K. pneumoniae (2580 CFU/duodenoscope), and A. baumannii (2600 CFU/duodenoscope). Since the cultures were repeatedly positive on three successive occasions, the contaminated devices were sent to the manufacturer for evaluation. Audits were carried out with the personnel responsible for reprocessing, which was aimed to optimize the procedures used, and subsequently, only one case of non-conformity was found. Conclusions: Our study highlighted both the potential risk of transmitting pathogens through the use of duodenoscopes and the importance of implementing a well-structured system of microbiological surveillance and training programs, in order to reduce the risk of spreading retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-associated infections.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Luisa Cristina & Marina Sartini & Elisa Schinca & Gianluca Ottria & Chiara Dupont & Palmira Bova & Gianni Coccia & Beatrice Casini & Anna Maria Spagnolo, 2019. "Is Post-Reprocessing Microbiological Surveillance of Duodenoscopes Effective in Reducing the Potential Risk in Transmitting Pathogens?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-10, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:140-:d:301416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/140/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/140/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:140-:d:301416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.