IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i8p1436-d225049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physical Fitness of School-Age Children after Cancer Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Iwona Malicka

    (The Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University School of Physical Education, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Joanna Mrowiec

    (The Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University School of Physical Education, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Natalia Sajkiewicz

    (The Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University School of Physical Education, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Siewierska

    (The Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University School of Physical Education, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Maria Czajkowska

    (“Cape of Hope” Clinic of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Oncology and Hematology, Wroclaw University Clinical Hospital, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Marek Woźniewski

    (The Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University School of Physical Education, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess physical fitness of school-age children after cancer treatment. The study was comprised of one hundred and fifty six children—children after cancer treatment ( n = 71, mean age 11.22 ± 3.11 years) vs. healthy children previously untreated for cancer ( n = 85, mean age 10.71 ± 1.22 years). Physical fitness was assessed indirectly based on a ball throw (assessment of strength, coordination, and upper limb speed), long jump (assessment of jumping ability, speed, and coordination), and a 60 m run (assessment of speed). The analysis was performed based on the Student’s t-test for independent samples and the analysis of variance and the post-hoc least significant difference test (LSD test). Children from the study group threw the ball closer and had shorter long jump performance compared to the control group, i.e., 12.93 [m] vs. 19.79 [m], respectively ( p < 0.001) and 2.46 [m] vs. 2.70 [m], respectively ( p = 0.02). However, their mean running time was longer, i.e., 13.33 [s] vs. 11.73 [s], respectively ( p = 0.01). Division according to sex showed additionally significantly shorter ball throw distance in the study group in both girls ( p = 0.001) and boys ( p < 0.001), significantly shorter jump length in the group of girls ( p = 0.01), and significantly longer running time in the group of boys ( p = 0.04). Children treated for cancer are characterized by decreased physical fitness, and motor ability is sex-dependent. Both groups showed decreased strength, coordination, and upper limb speed. Additionally, worse jumping ability was found in girls whereas decreased speed was observed in boys.

Suggested Citation

  • Iwona Malicka & Joanna Mrowiec & Natalia Sajkiewicz & Katarzyna Siewierska & Maria Czajkowska & Marek Woźniewski, 2019. "Physical Fitness of School-Age Children after Cancer Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:8:p:1436-:d:225049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/8/1436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/8/1436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iwona Malicka & Aleksandra Kowaluk & Marek Woźniewski, 2020. "Does Daily Physical Activity Level Determine the Physical Efficiency of Children After Treatment of Leukemia?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-11, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:8:p:1436-:d:225049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.