IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i7p1192-d219497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity of Self-Reported Body Mass, Height, and Body Mass Index in Female Students: The Role of Physical Activity Level, Menstrual Cycle Phase, and Time of Day

Author

Listed:
  • Eleni Kintziou

    (Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Egaleo, Greece)

  • Pantelis T. Nikolaidis

    (Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Egaleo, Greece
    Exercise Physiology Laboratory, 18450 Nikaia, Greece)

  • Vasiliki Kefala

    (Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Egaleo, Greece)

  • Thomas Rosemann

    (Gesundheitszentrum St. Gallen, 9001 St. Gallen, Switzerland)

  • Beat Knechtle

    (Gesundheitszentrum St. Gallen, 9001 St. Gallen, Switzerland
    Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland)

Abstract

A large part of research using questionnaires for female university students relies on self-reported body mass, height, and body mass index (BMI) data; however, the validity of these data in this population group is unknown. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to examine the validity of self-reported body mass, height, and BMI in female students. Female students of biomedical sciences ( n = 93, age 21.8 ± 4.7 years, height 1.63 ± 0.06 m, weight 60.5 ± 11.9 kg, and BMI 22.7 ± 3.8 kg/m 2 ) completed the short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and were tested for anthropometric characteristics at three different times of the day (12–2 p.m., n = 36; 2–4 p.m., n = 20; 4–6 p.m., n = 37). Participants over-reported height (+0.01 ± 0.02 m, +0.9 ± 1.2%, Cohen’s d = 0.22) and under-reported weight (−0.8 ± 2.1 kg, −1.2 ± 3.6%, d = −0.07) and BMI (−0.7 ± 1.0 kg/m 2 , −2.9 ± 4.2%, d = −0.19) ( p < 0.001). A moderate main effect of time of day on %Δweight ( p = 0.017, η 2 = 0.086) and %ΔBMI ( p = 0.045, η 2 = 0.067), but not on %Δheight ( p = 0.952, η 2 = 0.001), was observed, where the group tested at 4–6 p.m. under-reported weight and BMI more than the 2–4 p.m. group. The weekly metabolic equivalent (MET) × min did not correlate with %Δheight ( r = 0.06, p = 0.657), but its correlations with %Δweight ( r = −0.27, p = 0.051) and %ΔBMI ( r = −0.238, p = 0.089) reached statistical significance. Participants in the early follicular phase reported BMI more accurately ( p = 0.084, d = 0.68) than those in the mid-luteal phase. In conclusion, female students over-reported height and under-reported weight and BMI. Under-reporting weight and BMI is influenced by time of day and menstrual cycle phase. These findings should be considered by health professionals and researchers when administering questionnaires to female students.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleni Kintziou & Pantelis T. Nikolaidis & Vasiliki Kefala & Thomas Rosemann & Beat Knechtle, 2019. "Validity of Self-Reported Body Mass, Height, and Body Mass Index in Female Students: The Role of Physical Activity Level, Menstrual Cycle Phase, and Time of Day," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-7, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1192-:d:219497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1192/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1192/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emma O’Loughlin & Pantelis T. Nikolaidis & Thomas Rosemann & Beat Knechtle, 2019. "Different Predictor Variables for Women and Men in Ultra-Marathon Running—The Wellington Urban Ultramarathon 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1192-:d:219497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.