IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i6p1013-d215605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dengue Vector Control through Community Empowerment: Lessons Learned from a Community-Based Study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Sulistyawati Sulistyawati

    (Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden
    Department of Public Health, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta 55164, Indonesia)

  • Fardhiasih Dwi Astuti

    (Department of Public Health, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta 55164, Indonesia)

  • Sitti Rahmah Umniyati

    (Department of Parasitology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Tri Baskoro Tunggul Satoto

    (Department of Parasitology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Lutfan Lazuardi

    (Department of Health Policy and Management, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Maria Nilsson

    (Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Joacim Rocklov

    (Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Camilla Andersson

    (Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden
    Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden)

  • Åsa Holmner

    (Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden
    Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden)

Abstract

Effort to control dengue transmission requires community participation to ensure its sustainability. We carried out a knowledge attitude and practice (KAP) survey of dengue prevention to inform the design of a vector control intervention. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in June–August 2014 among 521 households in two villages of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Demographic characteristics and KAP questions were asked using a self-managed questionnaire. Knowledge, attitudes and practice scores were summarized for the population according to sex, age, occupation and education. The average knowledge score was rather poor—3.7 out of 8—although both attitude and practice scores were good: 25.5 out of 32 and 9.2 out of 11 respectively. The best knowledge within the different groups were found among women, the age group 30–44 years, people with a university degree and government employees. Best practice scores were found among retired people and housewives. There were several significant gaps in knowledge with respect to basic dengue symptoms, preventive practices and biting and breeding habits of the Aedes mosquito. In contrast, people’s practices were considered good, although many respondents failed to recognize outdoor containers as mosquito breeding sites. Accordingly, we developed a vector control card to support people’s container cleaning practices. The card was assessed for eight consecutive weeks in 2015, with pre-post larvae positive houses and containers as primary outcome measures. The use of control cards reached a low engagement of the community. Despite ongoing campaigns aiming to engage the community in dengue prevention, knowledge levels were meagre and adherence to taught routines poor in many societal groups. To increase motivation levels, bottom-up strategies are needed to involve all community members in dengue control, not only those that already comply with best practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Sulistyawati Sulistyawati & Fardhiasih Dwi Astuti & Sitti Rahmah Umniyati & Tri Baskoro Tunggul Satoto & Lutfan Lazuardi & Maria Nilsson & Joacim Rocklov & Camilla Andersson & Åsa Holmner, 2019. "Dengue Vector Control through Community Empowerment: Lessons Learned from a Community-Based Study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:6:p:1013-:d:215605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/6/1013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/6/1013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emmanuelle Kumaran & Dyna Doum & Vanney Keo & Ly Sokha & BunLeng Sam & Vibol Chan & Neal Alexander & John Bradley & Marco Liverani & Didot Budi Prasetyo & Agus Rachmat & Sergio Lopes & Jeffrey Hii & L, 2018. "Dengue knowledge, attitudes and practices and their impact on community-based vector control in rural Cambodia," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu & Cristian Eugen Luchian & Iuliana Luchian, 2018. "Community Based Programs Sustainability. A Multidimensional Analysis of Sustainability Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lia Faridah & Fedri Ruluwedrata Rinawan & Nisa Fauziah & Wulan Mayasari & Angga Dwiartama & Kozo Watanabe, 2020. "Evaluation of Health Information System (HIS) in The Surveillance of Dengue in Indonesia: Lessons from Case in Bandung, West Java," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu, 2019. "Community-Based Healthcare Programs Sustainability Impact on the Sustainability of Host Organizations: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Auliya A. Suwantika & Angga P. Kautsar & Woro Supadmi & Neily Zakiyah & Rizky Abdulah & Mohammad Ali & Maarten J. Postma, 2020. "Cost-Effectiveness of Dengue Vaccination in Indonesia: Considering Integrated Programs with Wolbachia -Infected Mosquitos and Health Education," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emily Haddy & Julia Brown & Faith Burden & Zoe Raw & Juliane Kaminski & Leanne Proops, 2023. "Sustainability in NGO Programming: A Case Study of Working Equid Welfare Organizations," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Tanvir Abir & O’mezie Ekwudu & Nazmul Ahsan Kalimullah & Dewan Muhammad Nur-A Yazdani & Abdullah Al Mamun & Palash Basak & Uchechukwu Levi Osuagwu & P Yukthamarani Permarupan & Abdul Hasnat Milton & S, 2021. "Dengue in Dhaka, Bangladesh: Hospital-based cross-sectional KAP assessment at Dhaka North and Dhaka South City Corporation area," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Zinette Bergman & Manfred Max Bergman, 2022. "Toward Sustainable Communities: A Case Study of the Eastern Market in Detroit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Von Ralph Dane M. Herbuela & Ferdinand S. de Guzman & Girly D. Sobrepeña & Andrew Benedict F. Claudio & Angelica Cecilia V. Tomas & Carmina M. Arriola-delos Reyes & Rachele A. Regalado & Mariama M. Te, 2019. "Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Regarding Dengue Fever among Pediatric and Adult In-Patients in Metro Manila, Philippines," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-15, November.
    5. Indra Gunawan & Nurchasanah, 2024. "Exploring factors influencing the microfinance program sustainability," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Sebastian Ion Ceptureanu & Eduard Gabriel Ceptureanu, 2019. "Community-Based Healthcare Programs Sustainability Impact on the Sustainability of Host Organizations: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:6:p:1013-:d:215605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.