IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i3p516-d205085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“In Initiative Overload”: Australian Perspectives on Promoting Physical Activity in the Workplace from Diverse Industries

Author

Listed:
  • Josephine Y. Chau

    (Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia
    Department of Health Systems and Populations, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia)

  • Lina Engelen

    (Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia)

  • Tracy Kolbe-Alexander

    (School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
    School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich 4305, Australia)

  • Sarah Young

    (Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia)

  • Heidi Olsen

    (School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
    School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, Queensland 4122, Australia)

  • Nicholas Gilson

    (School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia)

  • Nicola W. Burton

    (School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
    School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, Queensland 4122, Australia)

  • Adrian E. Bauman

    (Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia)

  • Wendy J. Brown

    (School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia)

Abstract

Introduction : With two thirds of adults in paid employment and one third physically inactive, workplaces are an important setting for promoting more physical activity. We explored the attitudes and practices of employees and managers from different industries towards sitting and moving at work, to inform the development of acceptable solutions for encouraging businesses to adopt activity-promoting workplaces. Method : We conducted focus groups with employees and structured interviews with upper/middle managers from 12 organisations in a range of industries (e.g., education, healthcare, manufacturing, construction, insurance, mining). Topics focused on past and current workplace health and wellness initiatives, workplace culture and environment related to physical activity, responsibility for employee physical activity patterns at work, and enablers of/barriers to activity promoting workplaces. Results : Physical activity was not an explicit priority in existing occupational health and wellness initiatives. Instead, there was a strong focus on education about preventing and managing injuries, such as manual handling among non-office workers and desk-based ergonomics for office workers. Physical activity was viewed as a strategy for maintaining work ability and preventing injury, particularly in blue-collar staff, rather than for chronic disease prevention. Managers noted structural/organisational barriers/enablers to promoting physical activity at work (e.g., regulations, costs, competing concerns), while employees tended to focus on individual constraints such as time and geographic location. The issues of "initiative overload" and making physical activity a part of “business as usual” emerged as strong themes from employees and managers. Conclusions : While there is stakeholder enthusiasm for creating activity-promoting workplaces, multi-level support is needed to make physical activity an integral part of day-to-day business. The synergism between occupational health and safety priorities could be leveraged to facilitate the creation of activity-promoting workplaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Josephine Y. Chau & Lina Engelen & Tracy Kolbe-Alexander & Sarah Young & Heidi Olsen & Nicholas Gilson & Nicola W. Burton & Adrian E. Bauman & Wendy J. Brown, 2019. "“In Initiative Overload”: Australian Perspectives on Promoting Physical Activity in the Workplace from Diverse Industries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:516-:d:205085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/516/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/516/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melanie Crane & Alec Cobbold & Matthew Beck & Tracy Nau & Christopher Standen & Chris Rissel & Ben J. Smith & Stephen Greaves & William Bellew & Adrian Bauman, 2022. "Interventions Designed to Support Physical Activity and Disease Prevention for Working from Home: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Apichai Wattanapisit & Waluka Amaek & Watcharawat Promma & Phatcharawadee Srirug & Uchane Cheangsan & Satit Khwanchum & Wattana Chadakorn & Kanittha Eardmak & Narumon Chadakorn, 2020. "Effects of a Workplace-Based Virtual-Run Intervention Among University Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Kelly Mackenzie & Elizabeth Such & Paul Norman & Elizabeth Goyder, 2021. "Understanding the Implementation of “Sit Less at Work” Interventions in Three Organisations: A Mixed Methods Process Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:516-:d:205085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.