IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i3p392-d202096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia Brotons

    (Department of Gastroenterology, Vega Baja Hospital of Orihuela, 03314 Orihuela, Spain
    Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain)

  • Mercedes Guilabert

    (Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, 03550 Elche, Spain)

  • Francisco Javier Lacueva

    (Department of Pathology and Surgery, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain)

  • José Joaquín Mira

    (Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, 03550 Elche, Spain
    Alicante-Sant Joan Health District, 03550 Alicante, Spain)

  • Blanca Lumbreras

    (Department of Public Health, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, 03550 Elche, Spain
    CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health, 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • María Dolores Picó

    (Department of Gastroenterology, University General Hospital of Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain)

  • Julián Vitaller

    (Department of Public Health, Miguel Hernandez University of Elche, 03550 Elche, Spain
    CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health, 28029 Madrid, Spain)

  • Mariana Fe García-Sepulcre

    (Department of Gastroenterology, University General Hospital of Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain)

  • Germán Belda

    (Department of Gastroenterology, Vega Baja Hospital of Orihuela, 03314 Orihuela, Spain)

  • Javier Sola-Vera

    (Department of Gastroenterology, University General Hospital of Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain)

Abstract

Colonoscopy services working in colorectal cancer screening programs must perform periodic controls to improve the quality based on patients’ experiences. However, there are no validated instruments in this setting that include the two core dimensions for optimal care: satisfaction and safety. The aim of this study was to design and validate a specific questionnaire for patients undergoing screening colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test, the Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire based on patients’ experience (CSSQP). The design included a review of available evidence and used focus groups to identify the relevant dimensions to produce the instrument (content validity). Face validity was analyzed involving 15 patients. Reliability and construct and empirical validity were calculated. Validation involved patients from the colorectal cancer screening program at two referral hospitals in Spain. The CSSQP version 1 consisted of 15 items. The principal components analysis of the satisfaction items isolated three factors with saturation of elements above 0.52 and with high internal consistency and split-half readability: Information, Care, and Service and Facilities features. The analysis of the safety items isolated two factors with element saturations above 0.58: Information Gaps and Safety Incidents. The CSSQP is a new valid and reliable tool for measuring patient’ experiences, including satisfaction and safety perception, after a colorectal cancer screening colonoscopy.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia Brotons & Mercedes Guilabert & Francisco Javier Lacueva & José Joaquín Mira & Blanca Lumbreras & María Dolores Picó & Julián Vitaller & Mariana Fe García-Sepulcre & Germán Belda & Javier Sola-V, 2019. "The Colonoscopy Satisfaction and Safety Questionnaire (CSSQP) for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Development and Validation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:392-:d:202096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/392/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/392/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doris Y. P. Leung & Ka Ming Chow & Sally W. S. Lo & Winnie K. W. So & Carmen W. H. Chan, 2016. "Contributing Factors to Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese People: A Review of Quantitative Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang Bai & Cho Lee Wong & Xiaolin Peng & Winnie K. W. So, 2020. "Colonoscopy Screening Behaviour and Associated Factors Amongst First-Degree Relatives of People with Colorectal Cancer in China: Testing the Health Belief Model Using a Cross-Sectional Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Doris Y. P. Leung & Joanne M. T. Chen & Vivian W. Q. Lou & Eliza M. L. Wong & Aileen W. K. Chan & Winnie K. W. So & Carmen W. H. Chan, 2017. "Effects of Promotional Materials on Attitudes and Fear towards Colorectal Cancer Screening among Chinese Older Adults: An Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Florence M. F. Wong, 2021. "Factors Associated with Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice towards Colorectal Cancer and Its Screening among People Aged 50–75 Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-10, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:392-:d:202096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.