IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i24p5092-d297650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Soft Tissue Therapy on Respiratory Efficiency and Chest Mobility of Women Suffering from Breast Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Domaszewska

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Poznan University of Physical Education, 61-871 Poznań, Poland)

  • Tomasz Pieńkowski

    (Province Polyclinic Hospital, 62-504 Konin, Poland)

  • Arkadiusz Janiak

    (Faculty of Rehabilitation and Sport, The President Stanislaw Wojciechowski State University of Applied Sciences in Kalisz, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland)

  • Dorota Bukowska

    (Department of Neurobiology, Poznan University of Physical Education, 61-871 Poznań, Poland)

  • Maria Laurentowska

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Poznan University of Physical Education, 61-871 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the following paper was to determine the influence of soft tissue therapy on respiratory efficiency and chest mobility of women suffering from breast cancer. This study was a controlled, randomized trial. Tests were carried out in a group of patients ( n = 49) who were hospitalized in the Province Polyclinic Hospital, Konin, Poland. In the study group, irrespective of the standard physical therapy program, an additional therapy program was run. The program consisted of applying specific techniques of soft tissue treatment. All patients in each term were subject to pulmonary function tests, chest mobility, and pain assessment. Statistical analysis of the obtained results of spirometry and chest mobility assessment has revealed no differences in the analyzed parameters between the examined groups in the period of joint therapeutic treatment. In the period between the third examination and the end of the 11-month-rehabilitation treatment, statistically significant differences were observed in the analyzed spirometry parameters; however, there was no difference in the parameters describing airflow in small airways (maximal expiratory flow at 50% (MEF 50 ), peak expiratory flow (PEF) between individual groups during consecutive examinations in the course of diversified therapeutic treatment. Chest mobility assessment of the patients, performed during diversified therapeutic treatment, revealed statistically significant differences between the groups. However, there was no difference between the examined groups as far as pain sensation is concerned. Enhancing the regular rehabilitation program by including additional therapeutic methods, which are based on myofascial release and post-isometric relaxation techniques, had beneficial effects regarding respiratory system efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Domaszewska & Tomasz Pieńkowski & Arkadiusz Janiak & Dorota Bukowska & Maria Laurentowska, 2019. "The Influence of Soft Tissue Therapy on Respiratory Efficiency and Chest Mobility of Women Suffering from Breast Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5092-:d:297650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5092/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5092/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Jesus Vinolo-Gil & Rocío Martín-Valero & Francisco Javier Martín-Vega & Manuel Rodríguez-Huguet & Veronica Perez-Cabezas & Gloria Gonzalez-Medina, 2022. "Respiratory Physiotherapy Intervention Strategies in the Sequelae of Breast Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5092-:d:297650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.