IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i24p4901-d294298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interpretation and Working through Contemptuous Facial Micro-Expressions Benefits the Patient-Therapist Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Felicitas Datz

    (Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Guoruey Wong

    (Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada)

  • Henriette Löffler-Stastka

    (Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
    Teaching Center, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Introduction: The significance of psychotherapeutic micro-processes, such as nonverbal facial expressions and relationship quality, is widely known, yet hitherto has not been investigated satisfactorily. In this exploratory study, we aim to examine the occurrence of micro-processes during psychotherapeutic treatment sessions, specifically facial micro-expressions, in order to shed light on their impact on psychotherapeutic interactions and patient-clinician relationships. Methods: In analyzing 22 video recordings of psychiatric interviews in a routine/acute psychiatric care unit of Vienna General Hospital, we were able to investigate clinicians’ and patients’ facial micro-expressions in conjunction with verbal interactions and types. To this end, we employed the Emotion Facial Action Coding System (EmFACS)—assessing the action units and microexpressions—and the Psychodynamic Intervention List (PIL). Also, the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI), assessed after each session by both patients and clinicians, provided information on the subjective quality of the clinician–patient relationship. Results: We found that interpretative/confrontative interventions are associated with displays of contempt from both therapists and patients. Interestingly, displays of contempt also correlated with higher WAI scores. We propose that these seemingly contradictory results may be a consequence of the complexity of affects and the interplay of primary and secondary emotions with intervention type. Conclusion: Interpretation, confrontation, and working through contemptuous microexpressions are major elements to the adequate control major pathoplastic elements. Affect-cognitive interplay is an important mediator in the working alliance.

Suggested Citation

  • Felicitas Datz & Guoruey Wong & Henriette Löffler-Stastka, 2019. "Interpretation and Working through Contemptuous Facial Micro-Expressions Benefits the Patient-Therapist Relationship," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:4901-:d:294298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/4901/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/4901/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:4901-:d:294298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.