IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i23p4669-d290128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Treatment during A Haze/Post-Haze Year on Subsequent Respiratory Morbidity Status among Successful Treatment Tuberculosis Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Suyanto Suyanto

    (Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand
    Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Riau University, Pekanbaru 28133, Indonesia)

  • Alan Geater

    (Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand)

  • Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong

    (Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the respiratory morbidity status within the two to three years among successful (completed/cured) treatment of tuberculosis cases during a haze year (2015) and a post-haze year (2016). The study was conducted among 133 cases of a 2015 group and 103 cases of a 2016 group between January to March 2018 in Pekanbaru city, Indonesia. The St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was used to assess respiratory morbidity status. A higher score corresponds to worse respiratory morbidity. Based on a directed acyclic graph, quantile regression models were constructed to assess the associations between haze/post-haze year and the SGRQ (symptom, activity, impact, and total) domains score. The subsequent respiratory morbidity status of tuberculosis (TB) cases was poorer among respondents treated during a haze year (2015). Among SGRQ domains, only the activity domain score showed significant difference, in which the median for the 2015 group was 23.7 (inter-quartile range (IQR); 17.2, 30.9) compared to 18.4 (IQR; 11.9, 24.8) for the 2016 group. The effect was limited to the 2015 group who were exposed by an average PM 10 index ≥ 55 during TB treatment. This raises concern for monitoring and improving the quality of life of TB patients treated during a haze year.

Suggested Citation

  • Suyanto Suyanto & Alan Geater & Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong, 2019. "The Effect of Treatment during A Haze/Post-Haze Year on Subsequent Respiratory Morbidity Status among Successful Treatment Tuberculosis Cases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4669-:d:290128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4669/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/23/4669/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:23:p:4669-:d:290128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.