IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i22p4583-d288646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Microbiological Sampling to Evaluate the Efficacy of Nasofibroscope Disinfection: The Tristel Trio Wipes System in Ear–Nose–Throat (ENT) Endoscopy

Author

Listed:
  • Savina Ditommaso

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Monica Giacomuzzi

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Raffaella Cipriani

    (Laboratory of Microbiology and Virology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Teresa Zaccaria

    (Laboratory of Microbiology and Virology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Rossana Cavallo

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Laboratory of Microbiology and Virology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Valeria Boggio

    (Department of Surgical Sciences, Otolaryngology Unit, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Roberto Albera

    (Department of Surgical Sciences, Otolaryngology Unit, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Carla M. Zotti

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy)

Abstract

Disinfection and sterilization are needed for guaranteeing that medical and surgical instruments do not spread contagious microorganisms to patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a simple manual technique of high-level disinfection (HLD) of flexible fiberoptic nasofibroscopes (FFNs) with wipes impregnated with a chlorine dioxide solution (Tristel Trio Wipes System—TTW) against a conventional automated washer machine (Soluscope ENT, Cimrex 12—AW). FFNs used in 62 patients undergoing endoscopy at an ENT clinic were sampled according to an aseptic procedure. For each nasoendoscopy, microbiological samples were taken at two times: (1) after a patient’s nasoendoscopy and (2) immediately after high-level disinfection. Ten microliters of each prepared sample were inoculated onto specific culture media for the detection of nasopharyngeal flora microorganisms. The microbiological results obtained from 62 post-disinfection samples revealed bacterial growth on two FFNs disinfected with AW, and five FFNs disinfected with TTW, but this difference is not statistically significant. None of the isolates were pathogenic bacteria. Our results are different than the results obtained by two previously published studies on the TTW system. In both studies, sampling was carried out by swabbing the tip and the handle surface of FFNs. This sampling method was the least effective method means of detecting bacteria on a surface. It can be concluded that the two disinfection systems allow providers to obtain a reduction of the saprophytic and pathogenic microbial load.

Suggested Citation

  • Savina Ditommaso & Monica Giacomuzzi & Raffaella Cipriani & Teresa Zaccaria & Rossana Cavallo & Valeria Boggio & Roberto Albera & Carla M. Zotti, 2019. "Using Microbiological Sampling to Evaluate the Efficacy of Nasofibroscope Disinfection: The Tristel Trio Wipes System in Ear–Nose–Throat (ENT) Endoscopy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-10, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4583-:d:288646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4583/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4583/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4583-:d:288646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.