IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i22p4509-d287201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of Guidelines for Healthier Canteens in Dutch Secondary Schools: A Process Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Irma J. Evenhuis

    (Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Ellis L. Vyth

    (Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Lydian Veldhuis

    (Netherlands Nutrition Centre, PO Box 85700, 2508 CK The Hague, The Netherlands)

  • Suzanne M. Jacobs

    (Netherlands Nutrition Centre, PO Box 85700, 2508 CK The Hague, The Netherlands)

  • Jacob C. Seidell

    (Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Carry M. Renders

    (Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The Netherlands Nutrition Centre has developed ‘Guidelines for Healthier Canteens’. To facilitate their implementation, implementation tools were developed: stakeholders’ questionnaires, the ‘Canteen Scan’ (an online tool to assess product availability/accessibility), a tailored advisory meeting/report, communication materials, establishment of an online community, newsletters, and a fact sheet with students’ wishes/needs. In this quasi-experimental study, we investigated the effect of these tools in secondary schools on (a) factors perceived by stakeholders as affecting implementation; (b) the quality of implementation. For six months, ten intervention schools implemented the guidelines, supported by the developed implementation tools. Ten control schools received the guidelines without support. School managers, caterers, and canteen employees ( n = 33) reported on individual and environmental factors affecting implementation. Implementation quality was determined by dose delivered, dose received, and satisfaction. Stakeholders ( n = 24) in intervention schools scored higher on the determinants’ knowledge and motivation and lower on need for support ( p < 0.05). Dose received (received and read) and satisfaction was highest for the advisory meeting/report (67.9%, 64.3%, 4.17), communication materials (60.7%, 50.0%, 3.98), and fact sheet (80%, 60%, 4.31). Qualitative analyses confirmed these quantitative results. In conclusion, a combination of implementation tools that includes students’ wishes, tailored information/feedback, reminders and examples of healthier products/accessibility supports stakeholders in creating a healthier school canteen.

Suggested Citation

  • Irma J. Evenhuis & Ellis L. Vyth & Lydian Veldhuis & Suzanne M. Jacobs & Jacob C. Seidell & Carry M. Renders, 2019. "Implementation of Guidelines for Healthier Canteens in Dutch Secondary Schools: A Process Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4509-:d:287201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4509/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4509/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4509-:d:287201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.