IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i21p4245-d282450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Topographic Data Accuracy on Watershed Management

Author

Listed:
  • Ismail Fathy

    (Department of Water and Water Structures Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt)

  • Hany Abd-Elhamid

    (Department of Water and Water Structures Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
    Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Shaqra University, Duwadimi 11911, Saudi Arabia)

  • Martina Zelenakova

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Košice 04200, Slovakia)

  • Daniela Kaposztasova

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Košice, Košice 04200, Slovakia)

Abstract

A digital elevation model (DEM) is a digital model or 3D representation of a terrain’s surface. There are many methods to create DEM such as LiDAR, stereo photogrammetry and topographic maps. DEMs are very important for many applications such as extracting terrain parameters for geomorphology and modeling water flow for hydrology or mass movement. A number of websites are available to provide DEM such as SRTM, GTOPO30 and ASTER GDEM but their accuracy differs from one to another and also selecting a small DEM size (high resolution) gives accurate information, but the analysis takes long time. This paper aims to analyze the impact of using different available DEMs on watershed geomorphological properties on order to provide guidelines for users to select the most suitable DEM that obtain an accurate analysis in less time. Three programs; watershed modeling systems: WMS, Global Mapper and Google Earth were used in this study. Three case studies were studied to check the accuracy of these models and select the most accurate one for application. Satellite images downloaded from Google Earth were used as a guide reference for the comparison due to their accuracy and high resolution. The results indicated that the SRTM model was more accurate (95%) for all case studies according to our comparison between its delineation and satellite images. ASTER GDEM is the second most accurate model with an accuracy of 87%, the GTOPO30’s accuracy is 80%.

Suggested Citation

  • Ismail Fathy & Hany Abd-Elhamid & Martina Zelenakova & Daniela Kaposztasova, 2019. "Effect of Topographic Data Accuracy on Watershed Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4245-:d:282450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4245/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/21/4245/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    watershed management; DEM; SRTM; ASTER GDEM; GTOPO30;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:21:p:4245-:d:282450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.