IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i18p3340-d265916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antibiotic Resistance of Airborne Viable Bacteria and Size Distribution in Neonatal Intensive Care Units

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy Beatriz Morgado-Gamero

    (Department of Exact and Natural Sciences, Universidad de la Costa, Calle 58#55-66, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia)

  • Martha Mendoza Hernandez

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad del Norte, Km 5 Vía Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 081007, Colombia)

  • Margarita Castillo Ramirez

    (Barranquilla Air Quality Monitoring Network, EPA—Barranquilla Verde, Barranquilla 080001, Colombia)

  • Jhorma Medina-Altahona

    (Department of Exact and Natural Sciences, Universidad de la Costa, Calle 58#55-66, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia)

  • Stephanie De La Hoz

    (Department of Exact and Natural Sciences, Universidad de la Costa, Calle 58#55-66, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia)

  • Heidy Posso Mendoza

    (Department of Bacteriology, Universidad Metropolitana, Calle 76 No. 42-78, Barranquilla 080020, Colombia)

  • Alexander Parody

    (Engineering Faculty, Universidad Libre Barranquilla, Carrera 46 No. 48-170, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia)

  • Elba C. Teixeira

    (Postgraduate Program in Remote Sensing, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Porto Alegre, RS 91501-970, Brazil)

  • Dayana Milena Agudelo-Castañeda

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universidad del Norte, Km 5 Vía Puerto Colombia, Barranquilla 081007, Colombia)

Abstract

Despite their significant impact on public health, antibiotic resistance and size distributions of airborne viable bacteria in indoor environments in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) remain understudied. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the antibiotic resistance of airborne viable bacteria for different sizes (0.65–7 µm) in private-style and public-style neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Airborne bacteria concentrations were assessed by a six-stage Andersen impactor, operating at 28.3 L/min. Public-style NICU revealed higher concentrations of airborne viable bacteria (53.00 to 214.37 CFU/m 3 ) than private-style NICU (151.94–466.43), indicating a possible threat to health. In the public-style NICU, Staphylococcus was the highest bacterial genera identified in the present study, were Staphylococcus saprophyticus and Staphylococcus epidermidis predominated, especially in the second bronchi and alveoli size ranges. Alloiococcus otitidis , Bacillus subtiles , Bacillus thuringiensis , Kocuria rosea , and Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligene , were identified in the alveoli size range. In NICU#2, eight species were identified in the alveoli size range: Bacillus cereus , Bacillus subtilis , Bacillus thuringiensis , Eikenella corrodens , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcus epidermidis , and Streptococcus gordoni. Multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) were found in both of the NICUs. Bacillus cereus strains were resistant to Ampicillin, Cefoxitin, Ceftaroline, and Penicillin G. Staphylococcus cohnii ssp. cohnii was resistant in parallel to ampicillin and G penicillin. Staphylococcus saprophyticus strains were resistant to Ampicillin, Penicillin G, Oxaxilin, and Erythromycin. Results may indicate a potential threat to human health due to the airborne bacteria concentration and their antibiotic resistance ability. The results may provide evidence for the need of interventions to reduce indoor airborne particle concentrations and their transfer to premature infants with underdeveloped immune systems, even though protocols for visitors and cleaning are well-established.

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy Beatriz Morgado-Gamero & Martha Mendoza Hernandez & Margarita Castillo Ramirez & Jhorma Medina-Altahona & Stephanie De La Hoz & Heidy Posso Mendoza & Alexander Parody & Elba C. Teixeira & Dayana, 2019. "Antibiotic Resistance of Airborne Viable Bacteria and Size Distribution in Neonatal Intensive Care Units," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3340-:d:265916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3340/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3340/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3340-:d:265916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.