IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i17p3017-d259494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Standardized Residency Training on Trainees’ Willingness to Become a Doctor: A Comparison between Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine

Author

Listed:
  • Junwen Yang-Huang

    (Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Wenji Qian

    (Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    The Dean’s Office, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kan Zhang

    (Science and Education Department, Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, Shanghai 200125, China)

  • Lu Shi

    (Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA)

  • Jiayan Huang

    (Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment, National Health Commission, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China)

Abstract

A standardized residency training program (SRT) was launched in Shanghai in 2010, for both Western Medicine (WM) and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). This study aimed to assess whether the program impacted trainees’ willingness to become a doctor and whether the program had different effects among WM and TCM trainees. A structured questionnaire was distributed to 2114 trainees to assess their perceptions and satisfaction with the program and their willingness to become a doctor after the exposure to the program. The trainees’ characteristics were compared between WM and TCM specialties using X 2 tests. The potential factors associated with trainees’ perception of the program and willingness to become a doctor after the exposure to the SRT program were assessed by multiple linear and logistic regression models. Compared to WM trainees ( n = 1853), TCM trainees ( n = 261) would be more likely to become doctors if there were no SRT program ( p = 0.003). Both individual and program-wide (different specialties) factors contributed to trainees’ perception, overall satisfaction, and willingness. Only specialty played an independent role in the associations with all three outcome variables. Inequality of characteristics between TCM and WM trainees reduced TCM trainees’ willingness to become a doctor after the exposure to the SRT program.

Suggested Citation

  • Junwen Yang-Huang & Wenji Qian & Kan Zhang & Lu Shi & Jiayan Huang, 2019. "The Influence of Standardized Residency Training on Trainees’ Willingness to Become a Doctor: A Comparison between Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-11, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:17:p:3017-:d:259494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/17/3017/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/17/3017/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:17:p:3017-:d:259494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.