IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i16p2928-d257856.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relation between Length of Exposure to Epidural Analgesia during Labour and Birth Mode

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Garcia-Lausin

    (Department of Experimental and Health Science, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
    Parc de Salut Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Mercedes Perez-Botella

    (Department of Experimental and Health Science, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08003 Barcelona, Spain
    Research in Childbirth and Health Unit (ReaRH), University of Central Lancashire, 100, Picketlaw Road, G76 0BF Glasgow, UK)

  • Xavier Duran

    (Methodology and Biostatistics Support Unit, Institut Hospital del Mar d’Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), 08003 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Maria Felisa Mamblona-Vicente

    (Parc de Salut Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Maria Jesus Gutierrez-Martin

    (Río Hortega University Hospital, 47012 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Eugenia Gómez de Enterria-Cuesta

    (Río Hortega University Hospital, 47012 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Ramon Escuriet

    (Centre for Research in Health and Economics, University Pompeu Fabra, 08005 Barcelona, Spain
    Catalan Health Service, Government of Catalonia, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
    Faculty of Health Sciences, University Ramon Llull-Blanquerna, 08025 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Objective: To appraise the relationship between the length of exposure to epidural analgesia and the risk of non-spontaneous birth, and to identify additional risk factors. This study is framed within the MidconBirth project. Study design: A multicentre prospective study was conducted between July 2016 and November 2017 in three maternity hospitals in different Spanish regions. The independent variable of the study was the length of exposure to epidural analgesia, and the dependent variable was the type of birth in women with uncomplicated pregnancies. The data was analyzed separately by parity. A multivariate logistic regression was performed. The odds ratios (OR), using 95% confidence intervals (CI) were constructed. Main outcome measures: During the study period, 807 eligible women gave birth. Non-spontaneous births occurred in 29.37% of the sample, and 75.59% received oxytocin for augmentation of labour. The mean exposure length to epidural analgesia when non-spontaneous birth happened was 8.05 for primiparous and 6.32 for multiparous women (5.98 and 3.37 in spontaneous birth, respectively). A logistic regression showed the length of exposure to epidural during labour was the major predictor for non-spontaneous births in primiparous and multiparous women followed by use of oxytocin (multiparous group). Conclusions: The length of exposure to epidural analgesia during labour is associated with non-spontaneous births in our study. It highlights the need for practice change through the development of clinical guidelines, training programs for professionals and the continuity of midwifery care in order to support women to cope with labour pain using less invasive forms of analgesia. Women also need to be provided with evidence-based information.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Garcia-Lausin & Mercedes Perez-Botella & Xavier Duran & Maria Felisa Mamblona-Vicente & Maria Jesus Gutierrez-Martin & Eugenia Gómez de Enterria-Cuesta & Ramon Escuriet, 2019. "Relation between Length of Exposure to Epidural Analgesia during Labour and Birth Mode," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:16:p:2928-:d:257856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:16:p:2928-:d:257856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.