IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i12p2116-d239877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chess Practice as a Protective Factor in Dementia

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Lillo-Crespo

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Mar Forner-Ruiz

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Jorge Riquelme-Galindo

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Daniel Ruiz-Fernández

    (Department of Computer Sciences, Advanced Polytechnic School of Alicante, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Sofía García-Sanjuan

    (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Alicante, San Vicente del Raspeig, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

Abstract

Background: dementia is one of the main causes of disability and dependency among the older population worldwide, producing physical, psychological, social and economic impact in those affected, caregivers, families and societies. However, little is known about dementia protective factors and their potential benefits against disease decline in the diagnosed population. Cognitive stimulating activities seem to be protective factors against dementia, though there is paucity in the scientific evidence confirming this, with most publications focusing on prevention in non-diagnosed people. A scoping review was conducted to explore whether chess practice could mitigate signs, deliver benefits, or improve cognitive capacities of individuals diagnosed with dementia through the available literature, and therefore act as a protective factor. Methods: twenty-one articles were selected after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: the overall findings stress that chess could lead to prevention in non-diagnosed populations, while little has been shown with respect to individuals already diagnosed. However, some authors suggest its capacity as a protective factor due to its benefits, and the evidence related to the cognitive functions associated with the game. Conclusion: although chess is indirectly assumed to be a protective factor due to its cognitive benefits, more studies are required to demonstrate, with strong evidence, whether chess could be a protective factor against dementia within the diagnosed population.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Lillo-Crespo & Mar Forner-Ruiz & Jorge Riquelme-Galindo & Daniel Ruiz-Fernández & Sofía García-Sanjuan, 2019. "Chess Practice as a Protective Factor in Dementia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:12:p:2116-:d:239877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/12/2116/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/12/2116/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dennis J. Selkoe, 1999. "Translating cell biology into therapeutic advances in Alzheimer's disease," Nature, Nature, vol. 399(6738), pages 23-31, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jorge Riquelme-Galindo & Manuel Lillo-Crespo, 2021. "Designing Dementia Care Pathways to Transform Non Dementia-Friendly Hospitals: Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ornella Di Pietro & Jordi Juárez-Jiménez & Diego Muñoz-Torrero & Charles A Laughton & F Javier Luque, 2017. "Unveiling a novel transient druggable pocket in BACE-1 through molecular simulations: Conformational analysis and binding mode of multisite inhibitors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:12:p:2116-:d:239877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.