IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i9p2017-d170016.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Early Recognition and Management of Sepsis in Sub-Saharan African Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Morton

    (Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK)

  • Marie Stolbrink

    (Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK)

  • Wanjiku Kagima

    (Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
    Department of Medicine, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, P.O Box 20723-00202, Kenya)

  • Jamie Rylance

    (Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool L3 5QA, UK
    Lung Health Group, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Programme (MLW), Blantyre, P.O. Box 30096, Malawi)

  • Kevin Mortimer

    (Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine and Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool L9 7AL, UK)

Abstract

Sepsis is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan African adults. Standardised management pathways have been documented to improve the survival of adults with sepsis from high-resource settings. Our aim was to assess the current evidence base for early sepsis interventions (recognition, empirical antibiotics, and resuscitation) in resource-poor settings of sub-Saharan Africa. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINHAL Plus databases to identify interventional studies for the early recognition and management of sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa (1 January 2000 to 1 August 2018) using a protocol-driven search strategy: adults, protocolised care pathway, and sub-Saharan Africa. We identified 725 publications of which three met criteria for final selection. Meta-analysis from two randomised controlled trials demonstrated that mortality was increased by ‘early goal-directed therapy’ interventions that increased fluid resuscitation (R.R. 1.26, 95% C.I. 1.00–1.58, p = 0.045; I 2 53%). The third observational cohort study demonstrated improved survival after implementation of protocolised management for sepsis (mortality 33.0% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.005). No study incorporated standardised protocols for empirical antibiotic administration. High rates of pneumonia and mycobacteraemia were reported. There has been little research into the early recognition and management of sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa. Interventional trials of early goal-directed therapy have, to date, increased mortality. There is an urgent need to develop effective strategies to improve outcomes for adults with sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Morton & Marie Stolbrink & Wanjiku Kagima & Jamie Rylance & Kevin Mortimer, 2018. "The Early Recognition and Management of Sepsis in Sub-Saharan African Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:9:p:2017-:d:170016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/9/2017/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/9/2017/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:9:p:2017-:d:170016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.