IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i7p1527-d158801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Accurate Are the ISAAC Questions for Diagnosis of Allergic Rhinitis in Korean Children?

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Hyun Kim

    (Department of Pediatrics, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Korea)

  • Dae Hyun Lim

    (Department of Pediatrics, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Korea
    Environmental Health Center for Allergic Rhinitis, Inha University Hospital, Ministry of Environment, Incheon 22332, Korea)

  • Mona Samra

    (Department of Pediatrics, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Korea
    Environmental Health Center for Allergic Rhinitis, Inha University Hospital, Ministry of Environment, Incheon 22332, Korea)

  • Eun Hye Kim

    (Environmental Health Center for Allergic Rhinitis, Inha University Hospital, Ministry of Environment, Incheon 22332, Korea)

  • Jeong Hee Kim

    (Department of Pediatrics, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 22332, Korea
    Environmental Health Center for Allergic Rhinitis, Inha University Hospital, Ministry of Environment, Incheon 22332, Korea)

Abstract

Background: The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) and the accuracy of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) questions for diagnosis of AR, in Korean children. Methods: Students that participated in an allergic disease prevalence survey in 2010–2017 were evaluated ( n = 18,425) using questionnaires and a skin prick test (SPT). Age−stratified (5−7, 8−10, 11−13, 14−16 years) prevalence of four rhinitis questions, accuracy of the questions for AR, and proportion of comorbidities in the AR and non-AR (NAR) groups were evaluated. Results: The proportion of students responding to the questionnaire that ever had symptoms of AR since birth, that is, the prevalence of “symptom, ever” was 47.6%. Based on the questionnaire and SPT, overall prevalence of AR and NAR were 21% and 26.5%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of “symptom, ever” were 57.5%, 58.4%, and 58.1%, respectively, and those of “diagnosis, ever”, who had ever been diagnosed with AR, were 39.8%, 76.9%, and 63.4%, respectively. Questionnaire−based asthma, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy were significantly associated with the AR group compared to the NAR group. Conclusions: Since the AR accuracy of the questionnaire is about 60%, it should be considered that the questionnaire based survey overestimates the true prevalence of AR in Korean children.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Hyun Kim & Dae Hyun Lim & Mona Samra & Eun Hye Kim & Jeong Hee Kim, 2018. "How Accurate Are the ISAAC Questions for Diagnosis of Allergic Rhinitis in Korean Children?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-10, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1527-:d:158801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1527/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1527/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1527-:d:158801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.