IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i6p1170-d150617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Arts based Courses within a UK Recovery College for People with Mental Health Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Stevens

    (Aldrington House, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, 35 New Church Road, Hove BN3 4AG, UK)

  • Catherine Butterfield

    (Aldrington House, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, 35 New Church Road, Hove BN3 4AG, UK)

  • Adrian Whittington

    (Aldrington House, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, 35 New Church Road, Hove BN3 4AG, UK)

  • Sue Holttum

    (Salomons Centre for Applied Psychology, Canterbury Christ Church University, Tunbridge Wells TN1 2YG, UK)

Abstract

No previous studies have evaluated arts based recovery college courses. Yet arts may assist in personal recovery, as often defined by service users, through social connection and personal meaning. This interdisciplinary study evaluated (i) whether self-reported wellbeing and arts activities increased following arts based recovery college courses, and (ii) how students, peer trainers and artist-trainers understood courses’ impact. The design was mixed-methods. Of 42 service user students enrolling, 39 completed a course and 37 consented to provide data. Of these, 14 completed pre and post course questionnaires on mental wellbeing and 28 on arts participation. Post course focus groups were held with six of eight peer trainers and five of seven artist-trainers, and 28 students gave written feedback. Twenty-four students were interviewed up to three times in the subsequent nine months. There were statistically significant increases in self-reported mental wellbeing and range of arts activities following course attendance. At follow-up 17 of 24 students reported improved mental wellbeing, while seven reported little or no change. Some spoke of increased social inclusion and continuing to use skills learned in the course to maintain wellbeing. Initial in-course experience of ‘artistic growth’ predicted follow-up reports of improvement. Future controlled studies should employ standardized measures of social inclusion and arts participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Stevens & Catherine Butterfield & Adrian Whittington & Sue Holttum, 2018. "Evaluation of Arts based Courses within a UK Recovery College for People with Mental Health Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:6:p:1170-:d:150617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/6/1170/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/6/1170/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenna Richards & Sue Holttum & Neil Springham, 2016. "How Do “Mental Health Professionals†Who Are Also or Have Been “Mental Health Service Users†Construct Their Identities?," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440156, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:6:p:1170-:d:150617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.